Monday, December 28, 2009

Fidel Castro on Humanity's Right to Life

Reflections by comrade Fidel

HUMANITY'S RIGHT TO LIFE

Climate change is already causing enormous damage and hundreds of millions of poor people are enduring the consequences.

The most advanced research centers have claimed that there is little time to avoid an irreversible catastrophe. James Hansen, from the NASA Goddard Institute, has said that a proportion of 350 parts of carbon dioxide by million is still tolerable; however, the figure today is 390 and growing at a pace of 2 parts by million every year exceeding the levels of 600 thousand years ago. Each one of the past two decades has been the warmest since the first records were taken while carbon dioxide increased 80 parts by million in the past 150 years.

The meltdown of ice in the Artic Sea and of the huge two-kilometer thick icecap covering Greenland; of the South American glaciers feeding its main fresh water sources and the enormous volume covering the Antarctic; of the remaining icecap on the Kilimanjaro, the ice on the Himalayan and the large frozen area of Siberia are visible. Outstanding scientists fear abrupt quantitative changes in these natural phenomena that bring about the change.

Humanity entertained high hopes in the Copenhagen Summit after the Kyoto Protocol signed in 1997 entered into force in 2005. The resounding failure of the Summit gave rise to shameful episodes that call for due clarification.

The United States, with less than 5% of the world population releases 25% of the carbon dioxide. The new US President had promised to cooperate with the international effort to tackle a new problem that afflicts that country as much as the rest of the world. In the meetings leading to the Summit, it became clear that the leaders of that nation and of the wealthiest countries were maneuvering to place the burden of sacrifices on the emergent and poor countries.

A great number of leaders and thousands of representatives of social movements and scientific institutions, determined to fight for the preservation of humanity from the greatest risk in history, converged in Copenhagen on the invitation of the organizers of the Summit. I’d rather avoid reference to details of the brutality of the Danish police force against thousands of protesters and invitees from social and scientific movements who traveled to the Danish capital. I’ll focus on the political features of the Summit.

Actually, chaos prevailed in Copenhagen where incredible things happened. The social movements and scientific institutions were not allowed to attend the debates. There were heads of State and Government who could not even express their views on crucial issues. Obama and the leaders of the wealthiest nations took over the conference, with the complicity of the Danish government. The United Nations agencies were pushed to the background.

Barack Obama, the last to arrive on the day of the Summit for a 12-hours stay, met with two groups of invitees carefully chosen by him and his staff, and in the company of one of them met at the plenary hall with the rest of the high-level delegations. He made his remarks and left right away trough the back door. Except for the small group chosen by him, the other representatives of countries were prevented from taking the floor during that plenary session. The presidents of Bolivia and the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela were allowed to speak because the Chairman of the Summit had no choice but to give them the floor in light of the strong pressures of those present.

In an adjacent room, Obama brought together the leaders of the wealthiest nations, some of the most important emerging States and two very poor countries. He then introduced a document, negotiated with two or three of the most important countries, ignored the UN General Assembly, gave a press conference and left like Julius Caesar after one of his victorious wars in Asia Minor that led him to say: “I came, I saw, I conquered.”

Even Gordon Brown, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, had said on October 19: “If we do not reach a deal over the next few months, let us be in no doubt, since once the damage from unchecked emissions growth is done, no retrospective global agreement in some future period can undo that choice. By then it will be irretrievably too late...”

Brown concluded his speech with these dramatic words: “We cannot afford to fail. If we fail now we will pay a heavy price. If we act now, if we act together, if we act with vision and resolve, success at Copenhagen is still within our reach, but, if we falter, the Earth will itself be at risk and, for the planet, there is no Plan B.”

But later he arrogantly said that the United Nations could not be taken hostage by a group of countries like Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua and Tuvalu. At the same time, he accused China, India, Brazil, South Africa and other emerging countries of being lured by the United States into signing a document that throws the Kyoto Protocol in the wastebasket without a binding agreement involving the United States and its wealthy allies.

I find it necessary to recall that the United Nations Organization was born hardly six decades ago, after the last World War, when there were no more than fifty independent countries. Today, after the hateful colonial system ceased to exist thanks to the resolute struggle of the peoples, it has a membership of over 190 independent nations. For many years, even the People’s Republic of China was denied admission to the UN while a puppet regime was its representative in that institution and in the privileged Security Council.

The tenacious support of the growing number of Third World nations would prove indispensable to China’s international recognition and become an extremely significant element for the acceptance of that country’s rights at the UN by the United States and its NATO allies.

It was the Soviet Union that made the greatest contribution to the heroic fight against fascism. More than 25 million of its people perished while the country was terribly devastated. It was from that struggle that it emerged as a superpower with the capacity to partly balance the absolute domination of the US imperial system and the former colonial powers to plunder the Third World countries unrestrictedly. Following the demise of the USSR, the United States extended its political and military power to the East, --up to Russia’s heart-- and enhanced its influence on the rest of Europe. Therefore, what happened in Copenhagen came as no surprise.

I want to insist on how unfair and outrageous were the remarks of the Prime Minister of the UK and the Yankee attempt to impose as the Summit Accord a document that was at no time discussed with the attending countries.

During his press conference of December 21, Cuba’s Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez made a statement that cannot be disproved. I will quote from some of its paragraphs: “I would like to emphasize that no agreement of the Conference of the Parties was reached in Copenhagen, that no decision was made as to binding or nonbinding commitments or pertaining to International Law; that simply did not happen. There was no agreement in Copenhagen.”

“The Summit was a failure and a deception for the world […] the lack of political will was left in the open…”

“…it was a step backward in the actions of the international community to prevent or mitigate the effects of climate change…”

“…the average world temperature could rise by 5 degrees…”

Right then our Foreign Minister adds other interesting data on the likely consequences of climate change according to the latest scientific research.

“…from the Kyoto Protocol until today the developed countries’ emissions rose by 12.8%... and 55% of that volume corresponds to the United States.”

“The average annual oil consumption is 25 barrels for an American, 11 barrels for a European, less than 2 barrels for a Chinese and less than 1 barrel for a Latin American or Caribbean citizen.”

“Thirty countries, including those of the European Union, are consuming 80% of the fuel produced.”

The fact is that the developed countries signatories of the Kyoto Protocol increased their emissions dramatically. Now, they want to replace the adopted bases of the emissions from 1990 with those of 2005. This means that the United States, which is the main source of emissions, would be reducing its emissions of 25 years ago in only 3%. It is a shameful mockery of the world public opinion.

The Cuban foreign minister, speaking on behalf of a group of ALBA member countries, defended China, India, Brazil, South Africa and other important emerging-economies states. He stressed the concept adopted in Kyoto that “common but differentiated responsibilities mean that the responsibility of the historical accumulators and the developed countries, who are the culprits of this catastrophe, differs from that of the small island states and the South countries, above all the least developed…”

“Responsibility means financing; responsibility means technology transfer on adequate terms. But, at this point, Obama resorts to a game of words and instead of talking of common but differentiated responsibilities, he speaks of ‘common but differentiated responses.’”

“…he then leaves the plenary hall without taking the trouble of listening to anybody; he had neither listened to anybody before taking the floor.”

In a subsequent press conference, before departing from the Danish capital, Obama had said: “There has been a meaningful and unprecedented breakthrough here in Copenhagen. For the first time in history, the largest economies have come to jointly accept responsibilities.”

In his clear and irrefutable presentation, our Foreign Minister said: “What does it mean that ‘the largest economies have come to jointly accept responsibilities’? It means that they are placing a large part of the burden of financing the relief and adaptation of countries, mostly the South countries, to climate change on China, Brazil, India and South Africa. Because it must be said that in Copenhagen we witnessed an assault, a holdup against China, Brazil, India and South Africa, and against every other euphemistically called developing country.”

These were the resounding and undeniable words used by our Foreign Minister to describe what happened in Copenhagen.

I must add that, when at 10:00 a.m. on December 19 our Vicepresident Esteban Lazo and the Cuban Foreign Minister had already left, a belated attempt was made to resurrect the Copenhagen cadaver as a Summit Accord. At that moment, practically every head of State had left and there was hardly any minister around. Again, the denunciation by the remaining members of the delegations from Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua and other countries could defeat the maneuver. That was the end of the inglorious Summit.

Another fact that should not be overlooked is that at the most critical moment of that day, in the wee small hours, the Cuban Foreign Minister, together with the delegations waging the honorable battle, offered UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon their cooperation in the ever harder struggle being fought as well as in future efforts necessary to preserve the life of our species.

The environmental group Wild World Fund has warned that if emissions are not drastically reduced climate change will go unchecked in the next 5 to 10 years.

But there is no need to prove the substance of what is said here that Obama did.

The US President stated on Wednesday, December 23, that people are justified in being disappointed about the outcome of the Summit on Climate Change. In an interview with the CBS television network, the President said that “instead of a total collapse if nothing had been done, which would have been a huge step backward; at least we could remain more or less where we were…”

According to the press dispatch, Obama is the target of most criticism from the countries that nearly unanimously feel that the result of the Summit was disastrous.

Now, the UN is in a quandary since many countries would find it humiliating to ask others to adhere to the arrogant and antidemocratic accord.

To carry on with the battle and to claim in every meeting, particularly in those of Bonn and Mexico, humanity’s right to life, with the morale and the strength that truth provides, is in my opinion the only way to proceed.

Fidel Castro Ruz

December 26, 2009

8:15 p.m.

Sunday, December 27, 2009

Arrest of Farouk Umar Abdul Mutallab Raises Serious Questions Over Delta Airline Incident in Detroit

Arrest of Farouk Umar Abdul Mutallab Raises Serious Questions Over Airplane Attack

PANW Editor's Note: On December 25 the United States authorities arrested a 23-year-old Nigerian Farouk Umar Abdul Mutallab aboard a Delta Airline flight from Amsterdam that landed in Detroit. News reports emanating from the U.S. indicate that it was an attempted terrorist attack that resulted in the fire and that Abdul Mutallab was either connected with Al-Qaida or sympathetic to its aims.

However, this incident raises a number of serious questions about the character of the attack. First of all why was Abdul Mutallab granted a multiple-entry visa into the United States in June 2008? In November, his father, Alhaji Umaru Abdul Mutallab, 70, a prominent and wealthy Nigerian banker who recently retired as Chairman of the First Bank Plc of Nigeria, warned the American embassy in Nigeria about concerns related to his son's behaviour. The senior Mutallab also served as Minister of Economic Development and Reconstruction during the mid-1970s in the Federal Nigerian Government that was under military rule at the time.

Consequently, why was Farouk Umar Abdul Mutallab allowed to maintain his U.S. visa status and board a plane bound for the United States? There have been reports that he had spent time in the United Arab Emirates and Yemen and implying that this may indicate a connection with Al-Qaida. However, there has been no specific evidence that he has links with Islamic organizations including Al-Qaida.

In addition, corporate media reports claim that the substances Mutallab had and attempted to ignite could have done substantial damage to the aircraft. This allegation is largely unsubstantiated and raises further questions about the nature of the incident. If these chemicals could have never caused any real damage to the aircraft and in fact the suspect was the only person seriously injured, then this may reveal that the incident is something other than what is being widely reported by media outlets in the U.S. and internationally.

Although U.S. intelligence and media spokespersons have stated that Yemen is a base for Al-Qaida, they do not make the claim that it is also major field of operations for the American Central Intelligence Agency which is working closely with the Yemeni government to fight the Islamic organizations that are in a military struggle with the government in this country that is divided politically and regionally.

In an Associated Press report on December 25 it stated that "Yemen's military hit suspected al-Qaida hideouts for the second time in a week, killing at least 30 militants in a remote area of the country--a fragmented, unstable nation the U.S. fears could turn into an Afghanistan-like refuge for the terrorist network.

"The strikes on Thursday, which were carried out with U.S. and Saudi intelligence help, hit a gathering of top leaders and other targets in a remote mountain valley, officials said. The newly aggressive Yemeni campaign against al-Qaida is being boosted by a dose of American aid, a reflection of Washington's concerns about al-Qaida's presence in a highly strategic location on the border with oil-rich ally Saudi Arabia." (AP, December 25)

This same AP article goes on to point out that "The Pentagon recently confirmed it has poured nearly $70 million in military aid into Yemen this year--compared with none in 2008. The U.S. military has boosted its counterterrorism training for Yemeni forces and is providing more intelligence, according to U.S. officials and analysts. The result appears to be a sharp escalation in Yemen's campaign against al-Qaida, which previously amounted to scattered raids against militants, mixed with tolerance of some fighters who made vague promises they would avoid terrorist activity."

Therefore, it is quite obvious that Yemen is a major target of U.S. military and intelligence activity. Corporate media reports continue to emphasize what it calls the unstable character of Yemen and labeling the country a "failed state", as it did with Afghanistan during the invasion of 2001.

Also Nigeria has been the scene of unrest in the North several months ago where the military and police killed several hundred people in a crackdown against an Islamic group, Boko Haram, where the leader of this group was killed by the police extra-judiciously. There is also a flare up in fighting in the Niger Delta region between groups fighting the western-based oil firms that dominate the area and the federal government's joint terrorism task force.

In a just as significant recent development, several western-based multi-national oil firms are threatening to sabotage the Nigerian economy because of their displeasure with a deal that was agreed upon with the People's Republic of China involving a $50 billion petroleum revenue generation project related to the export of oil to China. Shell is offering its operations for sale which will inevitably undermine the oil industry in Nigeria, which no longer is the dominant producer on oil on the continent.

These developments cannot be separated from the recent escalation of the U.S. war in Afghanistan and Pakistan. President Obama announced at West Point military academy on December 1 that his administration would be sending another 30,000 occupation troops into Afghanistan. This act is being carried out despite the overwhelming opposition to the escalation of the Afghan war by people inside the United States.

In Detroit, the FBI assassinated an African-American Imam on October 28. The investigation into the incident is being obstructed on several levels including the refusal of authorities to release the autopsy of the slain Islamic leader, Imam Luqman Ameen Abudllah, who had worked with the poor for decades on the city's west side. Imam Abdullah's assassination has drawn protests and calls for an independent investigation into his assassination by agents of the federal government.

Could Farouk Umar Abdul Mutallab be a pawn in a possible scenario of international intelligence intrigue controlled and manipulated by the United States? Such threats of terrorism have been used in the past to deflect the attention of the American people away from the worsening economic and political crisis facing the country. Since 2001 the American people have been subjected to reports of one plot and conspiracy after another. During the entire decade trillions of dollars have been literally stolen from the people of the United States through real estate, insurance and bank fraud schemes which the taxpayers have absorbed. Unemployment rates are the highest since the Great Depression and there will be a new upsurge in home foreclosures and evictions during 2010.

If Farouk Umar Abdul Mutallab was in contact with people he may have thought were al-Qaida operatives but were in fact CIA agents posing as Islamic resistance leaders, he could have been brainwashed and convinced to embark upon such a futile effort with the United States intelligence personnel knowing that these chemicals would, in all likelihood, only injure the suspect.

The incident of course will be used to intensify security practices in airports and throughout American society. It can also be utilized in attempts to justify and sway public opinion towards supporting the wars of occupation in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq and the extension of these imperialist efforts into Horn of Africa, the Gulf of Aden, the Indian Ocean and Yemen located in the Arabian Peninsula.

It is amazing that the Obama administration has said nothing about the incident in Detroit. Over the next few days more information will be revealed surrounding these events. One thing is certain and that is the United States government and ruling class has nothing to offer the people other than war, intensified domestic security and economic austerity. If they can bombard the airwaves with threats of terrorism, it will block any real discussion about the economic crisis in the corporate-controlled media that is heavily biased towards the Pentagon and Wall Street. The question of security will take priority over the economic crisis which has caused the unemployment of 34 million people, the foreclosures of millions of homes, the closing of hundreds of schools and the forcing of tens of thousands of university students away from their studies due to the monumental escalation of fees.

Abayomi Azikiwe
Editor, Pan-African News Wire
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Faruk: Profile of a rebellious son

Written by Abubakar A. Ibrahim
Nigerian Sunday Trust
Sunday, 27 December 2009 00:32

Farouk Umar Abdulmutallab is the son of retired First Bank chief, Dr Umaru Abdulmutallab, who hails from Katsina State. Though information on the would- be bomber is still sketchy, Sunday Trust gathered that he was born in 1986. He spent most of his formative years outside Nigeria and can best be described as British-educated.

He had his secondary education at British School of Lome, Togo, a school established 25 years ago to cater for the needs of British expatriates in the West African country. The school currently has students from about 37 different countries and caters for students between ages 3-18. While there, Abdul Mutallab became known for his radical views.

After graduation, he relocated to Dubai, in the United Arab Emirates. His radical tendencies took another dimension and became increasingly disturbing to his parents who tried to call him to order, according to family sources. He was admitted into the University College, London in 2005 as a student of Mechanical engineering, a programme that would have ended June, 2008.

His father, Dr Umaru Abdulmutallab had reported his son as a security threat to both US and Nigerian security agencies several months ago and the US had him on a security list though he was not considered a serious risk and was not placed on a ‘no flight list.’

Early reports have linked him to Alqaeda but US security agents have cautioned against this claims, saying though he has terrorist tendencies, he is not known to be affiliated to any terror group.

Abdulmutallab is from a very rich, polygamous family. His father, recently retired as Chairman of First Bank , one of the country’s biggest banks and is currently heading the soon-to-take-off Jaiz Bank.

It has not been determined where or how Abdulmutallib picked up his extremist views, it is known that he has spent more years outside Nigeria than in it. He admitted being trained for a month as a suicide bomber in Yemen. Details about him remain sketchy as all websites or blogs with information about him have been blocked. Already, some sites that contained his image have been rigged with virus by unknown parties.

His last known address is a four million pounds house in Central London, where Metropolitan Police have been conducting investigations.


Mutallab, an accomplished banker

Written by Idris Ahmed
Sunday Daily Trust
Sunday, 27 December 2009 00:28

Veteran Chairman of the Board of First Bank Plc Alhaji Umaru Abdul Mutallab formally retired from the position on December 13, 2009 after serving on the Board for thirteen years.

His voluntary retirement was announced at the Board meeting of the bank in Lagos.

He clocked the age of 70 years on December 15. He was born in 1939. First Bank was yet to announce a successor.

Mutallab was appointed to the Board of First Bank in 1996 and became its Chairman in 1999. He attended Barewa College, Zaria, Achimota College, Accra, Ghana and the South West London College, London.

He started his working career in 1965 as a Management Accountant with Fuller Jenks Beecroft & Co in London.

He also served as Chief Accountant/Acting General Manager, Defence Industries Corporation in Kaduna. He was also the Financial Controller of the company.

He rose to become the General Manager, New Nigeria Development Company Limited (NNDC) from 1968 to 1975. In 1975, he was appointed as Federal Commissioner (i.e. Minister) for Economic Development & Reconstruction and was re-assigned to the Federal Ministry of Cooperatives & Supply in 1976.

He was a member, Federal Executive Council from 1976 to 1978. He left to serve as Executive Vice Chairman/Managing Director, United Bank for Africa (UBA) up till 1988.

Mutallab is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered and Certified Accountants (FCCA), Fellow Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (FCA), Fellow Institute of the International Bankers Association of the United States (FIBA) and Fellow Institute of Bankers of Nigeria.

He holds the Nigeria National Honour of the Commander of the Order of the Niger (CON) and the Italian National Honour of Commander of the Order of Merit. He was awarded a Honourary Doctorate Degree by the Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife.

Mutallab also served on the boards of several companies such as Arewa Textiles Limited, NEPA, NACB, NCC, Nigeria Agip Oil, and the Cement Company of Northern Nigeria [CCNN].

He is currently Chairman of several companies, including Impresit Bakolori Plc, Incar Nigeria Plc and Spring Waters Nigeria Limited (SWAN). He is also Chairman, Business Support Group of the Vision 202020.


Security agencies in London search Abdul Mutallab’s family house

Written by Abubakar A. Ibrahim
Nigerian Sunday Trust
Sunday, 27 December 2009 00:18

Police in central London yesterday cordoned off Mansfield Street in London’s highbrow Maryelbone district to search the residence of suspected bomber, Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab.

He was reported to have lived in a plush basement flat belonging to his family. It has not be ascertained what the police are looking for but Sunday Trust gathered that a yet to be named brother of the suspect, who was also in the flat at the time was quizzed by the UK’s counterterrorism agents and metropolitan police for some time. He was however allowed to leave the residence after cooperating with authorities. He is now lodged in a hotel.

Britain has taken the investigations seriously and the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, said, “The security of the public must always be our primary concern.” Adding that Britain would take “Whatever action was necessary” to protect passengers.

Officers clad in forensic suits have been combing the building. Though it is not known when Abdul Mutallab was last at the flat, it is believed investigators are looking for contacts and other evidence that may help in the case.

The upscale building is located in the heart of London’s embassy district and flats in the area were reportedly sold for between 2.5 and 4 million pounds.

Meanwhile, authorities in Yemen said they have begun investigations into reports that Abdul Mutallab was trained in the country and acquired the device he had wanted to detonate in the US plane as well as instruction on how and when to detonate it. A government source in the country said, “If and when the would-be bomber’s alleged link to Yemen is officially identified, authorities will take immediate action.”

Yemen has been described by the United States as an “important partner” in the fight against terror since the September 11, 2001 attacks.


BREAKING NEWS: Umaru Mutallab's Son Identified as Delta Airline Attempted Bomber

Father reported him to US Authorities six months ago

By Yusuph Olaniyonu, 12.26.2009
Nigerian ThisDay

Goodluck orders investigation

The young man, who yesterday night attempted to ignite an explosive device aboard a Delta Airlines flight from Amsterdam to Detroit, Michigan in the United States has been identified as Abdul Farouk Umar Abdulmutallab, a 23-year-old son of Alhaji Umaru Mutallab, former First Bank chairman. Mutallab, a former minister and prominent banker recently retired from the Bank's board.

The older Mutallab, as at the time of filing this report, had just left his Katsina hometown for Abuja to speak with security agencies, family sources say. According to the family members, Mutallab has been uncomfortable with the boy's extreme religious views and had six months ago reported his activities to United States' Embassy, Abuja and Nigerian security agencies.

The older Mutallab was said to be devastated on hearing the news of Abdul Farouk's attempted bombing and arrest. A source close to him said he was surprised that after his reports to the US authorities, the young man was allowed to travel to the United States.

The family home of the Mutallabs in Central London, is currently being searched by men of the Metropolitan Police.

THISDAY checks reveal that the suspect, Abdulfarouk Umar Muttalab who is an engineering student at the University College, London had been noted for his extreme views on religion since his secondary school days at the British International School, Lome, Togo.

At the secondary school, he was known for preaching about Islam to his school mates and he was popularly called “Alfa”, a local coinage for Islamic scholar. After his secondary school, the suspect went to University College London to study engineering and later relocated to Egypt, and then Dubai. While in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates, he declared to his family members that he did not want to have anything to do with any of them again.

His father, Muttalab is a regular visitor to the US where he visits for medical check-up and holidays. He is expected to issue a statement later today.

Muttalab is married to an Arab of Yemeni-descent. However, THISDAY could not confirm at the time of filing this report if the woman is the mother of the suspect now receiving treatment in Ann Harbor Hospital, Detroit, for burns suffered while he was trying to detonate the explosive device in the plane.

Meanwhile, Prof. Dora Akunyili, minister of information and communications, has issued the following statement: " Federal Government of Nigeria received with dismay the news of an attempted terrorist attack on a US airline. We state very clearly that as a nation, we abhor all forms of terrorism. The Vice President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Dr Goodluck Ebele Jonathan has directed Nigerian security agencies to commence full investigation of the incident. While steps are being taken to verify the identity of the alleged suspect and his motives, our security agencies will cooperate fully with the American authorities in the on-going investigations. Nigerian government will be providing updates as more information becomes available."

Abdul Farouk Abdulmutallab, had caused panic when he tried to detonate some explosive device strapped to his leg on Christmas Day while the US airliner was about to land at Detroit Metro Airport with 278 people on board.

Abdulmutallab was overpowered by passengers after the failure of the device to ignite properly. He is currently being questioned by the FBI, according to a senior US official. A passenger, identified as Jasper Schuringa, told CNN that with the aid of the cabin crew, he helped subdue and isolate Abdulmutallab.

Agency reports quoted the US federal law enforcement and airline security agencies as saying Abdulmutallab was taken into custody and is being treated for second- and third-degree burns on his thighs. Reports say the remains of the device the suspect detonated have been sent to an FBI explosives laboratory in Quantico, Virginia, for analysis.

Even with the initial official impression that the suspect was acting alone and did not have any formal connections to organised terrorist organisations, there are reports that he was indeed a hard-core, trained al-Qaeda operative. Abdulmutallab was quoted in a US federal security bulletin to have admitted having extremist ties and said the explosive device "was acquired in Yemen along with instructions as to when it should be used".

A Statement from Representative Peter King of New York, the senior Republican on the House of Representatives Homeland Security Committee, branded the explosive device as "fairly sophisticated". "(The device) appears to be different from what we've encountered before," Mr King told Fox News. "My understanding also is that while (the suspect) is not on a watch list, he definitely has terror connections.

"There is a terrorist nexus leading towards al-Qaeda involving this assailant. When it did go off he himself was seriously injured, my understanding is he has third-degree burns. This could have been catastrophic."

Abdulmutallab flew into Amsterdam’s Schiphol Airport on a KLM flight from Lagos and is not believed to be on any "no fly" list. This is despite his name appearing in a US database of people with suspect connections. An administration official also said he did not undergo secondary security screening in Amsterdam. It was from here he transferred to Northwest Airlines - which is undergoing a merger with Delta Airlines - for the nine-hour flight to Detroit in an Airbus A330-330.

US President Barack Obama, who was holidaying in Hawaii, acting on briefing on the incident, instructed in a subsequent discussion with security advisers "that all appropriate measures be taken to increase security for air travel".

Direct fallout of this incident is more rigorous security checks by airlines. A spokesperson for BAA said British passengers travelling to the US should expect their airline to carry out additional security checks prior to boarding.

"To support this important process, which will take time, we would advise passengers to leave more time to check in and limit the amount of baggage being taken on board the aircraft," she added.
"If in any doubt, please contact the relevant airline for further information."

A Department of Homeland Security statement on Friday told air passengers that they "may notice additional screening measures put into place to ensure the safety of the travelling [sic] public on domestic and international flights."


Terrorist suspect is my Son, Mutallab …. as FG orders probe

Our Reporter with agency reports
Nigerian Vanguard

ABUJA—A renowned Nigerian ex-banker, Umaru Mutallab, on Saturday admitted that the man arrested, Mallam Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, over a botched attempt to blow up a US airliner on a flight from Amsterdam to Detroit is his son.

According to him: “I have been receiving telephone calls from all over the world about my child who has been arrested for an alleged attempt to bomb a plane,” Mutallab said on his way to Abuja where he has been summoned by security agents.

“I am really disturbed. I would not want to say anything at the moment until I put myself together. I will address a press conference on the issue on Monday . I have been summoned by the Nigerian security and I am on my way to Abuja to answer the call,” he said.

He said he just left his town, Funtua, Katsina State for Abuja.

FG orders full probe

Meanwhile, the Federal Government weekend directed the relevant security agencies in Nigeria to undertake full investigation into the alleged attempt by a Nigerian, Mallam Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, to bomb a Northwest Airlines Boeing 330 plane in Detroit, USA, on Christmas day, just as the suspect’s father was said to be helping the security agencies in their investigation as he feared his son was the suspect.

Alhaji Umaru Mutallab former Chairman of First Bank of Nigeria told The Associated Press that his son Umar Farouk was a one-time university student in London who had left Britain to travel abroad. He said his son hadn’t lived in London “for some time” but he wasn’t sure exactly where he went to.

Alhaji Mutallab said, “I believe he might have been to Yemen, but we are investigating to determine that,” adding that he would provide more details later as he learned more from the authorities.

The Federal Government in its reaction condemned the attempted bombing, saying it has opened its own investigation into the suspect and promised to cooperate fully with the United States authorities on the issue.

A statement issued by the Minister of Information and Communications, Professor Dora Akunyili on behalf of Vice President Goodluck Jonathan, in Abuja weekend, said the security agencies would unravel the identity of the suspect and his motives.

The statement said: “The Federal Government received with dismay the news of an attempted terrorist attack on a US airline. We state very clearly that as a nation, we abhor all forms of terrorism.

“The Vice President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Dr. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan has directed Nigerian security agencies to commence full investigation into the incident. While steps are being taken to verify the identity of the alleged suspect and his motives, our security agencies will cooperate fully with the American authorities in the on-going investigations.

“Nigerian government will be providing updates as more information becomes available.”

How it all started

The commotion began as Northwest Airlines Flight 253, carrying 278 passengers and 11 crew members from Amsterdam, prepared to land in Detroit just before noon last Friday. Travellers said they smelled smoke, saw a glow, and heard what sounded like firecrackers. At least one person climbed over others and jumped on the man, who officials say was trying to ignite an explosive device.

“It sounded like a firecracker in a pillowcase,” said Peter Smith, a passenger from the Netherlands. “First there was a pop, and then (there) was smoke.”

Smith said one passenger, sitting opposite the man, climbed over passengers, went across the aisle and tried to restrain the man. The heroic passenger appeared to have been burned.

Afterward, the suspect was taken to a front-row seat with his trousers cut off and his legs burned. Multiple law enforcement officials also said the man appeared badly burned on his legs, indicating the explosive was strapped there. The components were apparently mixed in-flight and included a powdery substance, multiple law enforcement and counter terrorism officials said.

The White House said it believed it was an attempted act of terrorism and stricter security measures were quickly imposed on airline travel. Dutch anti-terrorism authorities said the U.S. has asked all airlines to take extra precautions on flights worldwide that are bound for the United States.

The incident was reminiscent of Richard Reid, who tried to destroy a trans-Atlantic flight in 2001 with explosives hidden in his shoes, but was subdued by other passengers.

One law enforcement official said the man claimed to have been instructed by al-Qaida to detonate the plane over U.S. soil, but other law enforcement officials cautioned that such claims could not be verified immediately, and said the man may have been acting independently — inspired but not specifically trained or ordered by terror groups.

According to Associated Press, all the officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the investigation was ongoing.

Intelligence and anti-terrorism officials in Yemen said they were investigating claims by the suspect that he picked up the explosive device and instructions on how to use it in that country. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to speak to the media.

Melinda Dennis, who was seated in the front row of the plane, said the man involved was brought to the front row and seated near her. She said his legs appeared to be badly burned and his pants were cut off. She said he was taken off the plane handcuffed to a stretcher.

An intelligence official said he was being held and treated in an Ann Arbor, Mich, hospital. The hospital said one passenger from the flight was taken to the University of Michigan Medical Center in Ann Arbor, but referred all inquiries to the FBI.

One law enforcement official, also speaking on condition of anonymity, said Mutallab’s name had surfaced earlier on at least one U.S. intelligence database, but he was not on a watch list or a no-fly list.

The suspect boarded in Nigeria and went through Amsterdam en route to Detroit, Rep. Peter King, the ranking GOP member of the House Homeland Security Committee, told CNN. A spokeswoman for police at the Schiphol airport in Amsterdam declined comment about the case or about security procedures at the airport for Flight 253.

Dutch airline KLM says the connection in Amsterdam from Lagos, Nigeria, to Detroit involves a change in carrier and a change in aircraft.

Dutch antiterrorism authorities said weekend that Mutallab was travelling on a U.S. visa valid through the first half of 2010.

She said an initial investigation showed that routine security procedures were followed at Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam with no irregularities. Mutallab’s name was on the passenger manifesto that was forwarded and approved by U.S. authorities before takeoff.

London’s Metropolitan Police also was working with U.S. officials, said a spokeswoman who spoke on condition of anonymity in line with department policy. A search was under way Saturday at an apartment building where Mutallab is said to have lived in a posh West London neighborhood.

University College, London issued a statement saying a student named Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab studied Mechanical Engineering there between September 2005 and June 2008. But the college said it wasn’t certain the student was the same person who was on the plane.

Delta Air Lines Inc., which acquired Northwest last year, said a passenger caused a disturbance, was subdued, and the crew requested that law enforcement officials meet the flight.

Passenger Syed Jafry, a U.S. citizen who had flown from the United Arab Emirates, said the incident occurred during the plane’s descent. Jafry said he was seated three rows behind the passenger and said he saw a glow, and noticed a smoke smell.

It was another passenger, who Jafry described as being in his 20s or early 30s and having a medium, stocky build, who quickly jumped toward the man who had started the fire. “He did a good job with his power, tackled him and put him under arrest,” Jafry said Saturday.

Federal officials said there would be heightened security for both domestic and international flights at airports across the country, but the intensified levels would likely be “layered,” differing from location to location depending on alerts, security concerns and other factors.

Passengers can expect to see more screening, bomb-sniffing dogs, officer units and behavioral-detection specialists at some airports, but there will also be unspecified less visible precautions as well, officials said.

The FBI and the Homeland Security Department issued an intelligence note on Nov. 20 about the threat picture for the holiday season, which was obtained by The Associated Press. At the time, officials said they had no specific information about attack plans by al-Qaida or other terrorist groups.

President Barack Obama was notified of the incident and discussed it with security officials, the White House said. Officials said he is monitoring the situation and receiving regular updates from his vacation spot in Hawaii.

Mallam Abdulmutallab who was born on December 22, 1986 into the family of multi-billionaire, former Chairman of First Bank, is said to be held currently on immigration charges until full terror charges are assembled. He was said to have been on a terrorist watch list for quite a while.


Father of Nigerian would-be plane bomber warned US

By PAMELA HESS and MATTHEW LEE, Associated Press Writers

WASHINGTON – U.S. government officials tell The Associated Press that the Nigerian man charged with trying to destroy a jetliner came to the attention of U.S. intelligence in November when his father went to the U.S. embassy in Abuja, Nigeria, to express his concerns about his son.

A congressional official said Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, a 23-year-old Nigerian, popped up in U.S. intelligence reports about four weeks ago as having a connection to both al-Qaida and Yemen.

Another government official said Abdulmutallab's father went to the embassy in Abuja with his concerns, but did not have any specific information that would put him on the "no-fly list" or on the list for additional security checks at the airport.

Neither was the information sufficient to revoke his visa to visit the United States. His visa had been granted June 2008 and was valid through June 2010. Both officials spoke on condition of anonymity because neither was authorized to speak to the media.


...US Blames Security At Lagos Airports

From Laolu Akande, New York
Nigerian Guardian

IN response to the aborted terrorist attack on a US-bound plane, the White House is seeking to gather more information from the Nigerian government, particularly its aviation authorities, regarding the details of the alleged Nigerian terrorist, Umar Farouk Abudul Mutallab, a 23 year-old son of the immediate past chairman of First Bank of Nigeria Plc, Dr. Umaru Abdul Mutallab, who is also the current Chairman of Nigeria's first Islamic bank, Jaiz International Plc.

The United States is worried that the suspect was screened and given a clean bill of health at the Murtala Mohammed Airport, where he is believed to have started his journey.

According to US sources, at the time of the incident, (afternoon time in the US), it was already late in both Europe and Nigeria, but local media reports say US investigators are still awaiting feedback from the Nigerian end as at yesterday morning, New York time.

Since the incident occurred on Christmas day, sources in the US have continued to cast aspersion on the level of security at the Murtala Mohammed Airport, describing it as very porous.

A US Congressman from New York Peter King specifically stated that the Nigerian airport is on the US Federal Aviation Authority's (FAA) list of airports with poor security.

The implication is that the alleged terrorist may have easily sneaked the suspected material through airport security. US FBI agents have since taken the explosive devices to its laboratory in Virginia State, US to determine its exact composition.

Leaders of some Nigerian groups in the US have been looking forward to a statement from the Nigerian Embassy, a hope that is dashed by lack of a Nigerian Ambassador in the US.

Similarly, the Embassy in Washington DC could not issue a statement due to the fact that incident happened during the yuletide.

Meanwhile, US-based Nigerian professionals (many of them US citizens) expressed were alarmed about the news of the alleged involvement of a Nigerian in a terrorist act aboard a US airline.

Dr. Baba Adam, a US university administrator, said it is unfortunate that Nigeria "has or is becoming a breeding ground for extremist groups and organizations. This is a direct attack on us, as Nigerians in the US, as well as our new home country - the United States of America.

"This terrorist and whoever his collaborators are must be brought to full force of the law under the USA Patriot Act," said Adam.

In a similar vein, Dr Ola Kassim, a medical practitioner and former chairman of the Nigerians in the Diaspora Organization, which head office is in the US, said the latest attempt to blow up a passenger airline should be condemned in unmistakable terms by all right-thinking human beings worldwide, regardless of the nationality or religious background of the alleged perpetrator."

Kassim urged the Nigerian government and all "Nigerian citizens to openly condemn this terrorist act. We live in a dangerous world."

He, however, noted that " the passport system in Nigeria lags below international standards, since many non-Nigerian citizens are able to obtain genuine Nigerian Passports through fraudulent means."

According to Kassim, "Whether or not the alleged perpetrator is a Nigerian does not matter. Either way, the Nigerian identity as opposed to all Nigerians becomes linked with the issue - either for lax security at our airports, or for the lack of due diligence in identifying bonafide Nigerians, who are worthy of being issued our travel documents."

But in a more radical reaction, a US-based Nigerian pro-democratic group, Citizens For Nigeria (CFN), said it is "outraged by the unfortunate set of events through the years in the Nigerian nation that have culminated into this act of terrorism in the US, supposedly by a Nigerian national."

The CFN was founded by a Nigerian journalist, Tunde Odediran, few years ago in New Jersey, and has now grown to include other active American-Nigerians clamouring for change in Nigeria and holding the Federal Government responsible for the fate of the country.

In a statement issued over the weekend in the US by one of CFN's officials, Ayo Abimbola, a US military veteran, the group noted that the event involving the Nigerian suspect in Detroit, US, is "a disaster that has been long in coming was averted.

"This happened because a group of selfish Nigerian leaders with Islamic affiliation have, instead of taking the necessary action, quietly aided Islamic fundamentalism for almost 30 years. The Citizens for Nigeria can predict that when Abdul Farouk Abdul Mutallab's identity is revealed, he will be known to come from the northern part of Nigeria that has always received State protection and patronage for religious persecution."

CFN recalled that in July, 2009, "when the security forces in northern Nigerian battled the remnants of an Islamic sect loosely modeled after Afghanistan's Taliban movement, the world did not pay attention.

"In that particular incident, more than 180 people died; and it was a local Nigerian news. Now that a Nigerian, likely affiliated with Al Qaeda, attacked an American airline, the world's attention will be fixed on Nigeria. To a majority of Nigerians, religious terrorism has a long history."

Indeed, earlier this year in May, The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) added six new countries to its list of nations responsible for committing violations of religious freedom. Nigeria featured in that list, alongside, Pakistan, Afghanistan, North Korea, China, Iran and Iraq.

According to the CFN, "the government of Nigeria has done little to prevent sectarian violence and there have been no serious efforts to investigate or prosecute the perpetrators of the numerous sectarian killings and crimes that have occurred over the past 10 years.

On May 1, under the auspices of the 1998 International Religious Freedom Act, USCIRF recommended that Nigeria be named as a "Country of Particular Concern (CPC)", a category designated for egregious abusers of religious freedom, which includes the concept of gross failure to act to prevent severe violations.


Bomb Attack: Senate Condemns Mutallab's Action

Exonerates Other Nigerians From Terrorism

From Alifa Daniel, Asst Politics Editor, Abuja

THE Senate, yesterday, exonerated other Nigerians from the alleged attempt, by a Nigerian, Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab, to blow up an American airline.

Mutallab was overpowered by other passengers as he allegedly attempted to ignite an incendiary substance he had on him.

Senate Spokesman, Senator Ayogu Eze, in a statement he issued yesterday, condemned Mutallab's action, which he described as a "strange act of terrorism."

"We condemn this strange act of terrorism from a Nigerian in very strong terms. We are at a loss as to where he got this strange habit, because Nigeria abhors terrorism in all its ramifications.

"The Senate, therefore frowns at this isolated unfortunate incident; and we ask the world to treat him on his own merit and not associate this conduct with law-abiding Nigerians who are decent and respectable international citizens wherever they are.

"The Senate equally urges Nigerians to rise in condemnation of this naked attempt to smear the image of our dear country of our dear country. Nobody should import fundamentalism into Nigeria under any guise."

The Los Angeles Times report on the web yesterday said Mutallab was on an Amsterdam-to-Detroit flight and allegedly tried to blow up the airliner, which landed safely, though he is said to be badly hurt. Authorities consider it a terrorism attempt.

The report reads that the Nigerian passenger attempted to ignite an incendiary device aboard a Northwest Airlines flight from Amsterdam to Detroit on Friday as the plane began its approach for landing, US federal officials said.

The report reads in part: 'The suspect, identified as Abdul Mutallab, 23, suffered severe burns as a result of the attempt, authorities said, and two of the other 277 passengers reported minor injuries.

'FBI agents were investigating the incident, which a White House official said was an attempted act of terrorism."He was trying to ignite some kind of incendiary device," said a federal anti-terrorism official, who requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the case. "He lit himself on fire and he's suffered some burns."'The device, which mixed powder and liquid, was said to be less powerful than a bomb.

'President Obama was briefed on the incident during his Hawaii vacation, the White House said in a statement, and airport security was stiffened worldwide.

'The suspect -- an engineering student at University College of London, according to ABC News and NBC News -- began his trip Thursday from Nigeria. It was not clear Friday whether Mutallab underwent security screening in Amsterdam or merely changed planes there.'It also was uncertain Friday night whether the suspect had ties to a terrorist organization or had attempted the attack on his own, authorities said.

Despite earlier reports that he had claimed a connection to Al Qaeda, Mutallab denied any such link in later statements to FBI agents interrogating him, the anti-terrorism official said.'"Right now, he is saying he was not part of an organization or a coordinated effort. I want to caution people from jumping headlong into the Al Qaeda link because it's a very murky area," the official said.

'The suspect smuggled a powder aboard the plane in a container taped to his leg, the official said.'Covering himself with a blanket to hide his actions, he used a syringe to inject a liquid into the powder, and a fire resulted from the combustible mix, according to the official, who did not identify the materials.

'The official denied reports that Mutallab had been on the federal "no-fly" list of suspected extremists and other potentially dangerous individuals, which is shared with airlines. But the official did not rule out the possibility that the Nigerian had been on some other U.S. government database.

'Various media reports spelled the suspect's name different ways. The Associated Press gave his full name as Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab.'The Northwest jet, an Airbus 330 with Delta markings, landed about noon local time. (The two airlines merged in April 2008.) It carried a crew of 11.

Syed Jafri, a US citizen who had flown from the United Arab Emirates, said the incident occurred during the plane's descent. Jafri said he was seated three rows behind the passenger and said he saw a glow and smelled smoke. Then, he said, "a young man behind me jumped on him.Next thing you know, there was a lot of panic," Jafri said.


...Poser Over Security At Nigerian Airports

By Wole Shadare
Nigerian Guardian

THE arrest of a Nigerian, Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab, over an attempt to blow up a United States Airliner belonging to Delta Airlines, has raised fresh concern about aviation security in not just Nigeria alone but all over the world.

Mutallab was said to have departed Nigeria through the Murtala Muhammed International Airport, Lagos, to Amsterdam en-route Detroit. He was reported to have boarded Royal Dutch Airlines KLM flight from Lagos to Amsterdam, and from Amsterdam to Detroit, without being detected by aviation authorities in both Nigeria and Netherlands.

According to reports, an attempted terrorist attack on a Christmas Day flight began with a pop and a puff of smoke - sending passengers scrambling to subdue a Nigerian man who claimed to be acting on orders from al-Qaeda to blow up the airliner, officials and travelers said.

Passengers said they smelled smoke, saw a glow, and heard what sounded like firecrackers. At least, one person climbed over others and jumped on the man, who officials say was trying to ignite an explosive device.

Not a few believe that security measures put in place at the Lagos airport or any of the Nigerian airports may not be effective enough to detect the carriage of explosives or drugs.

Although the country has spent so much to improve security, but corruption, on the part of aviation security officials, has made put a stumbling block on the efforts of the Federal Government from yielding the expected dividends, as touting and toll collection has given way to effective policing of both the sensitive and non sensitive areas alike.

The Guardian had reported security lax at the airports, as having aided drug trafficking. The Nigerian Drug Law Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) would have recorded more success at fighting drug traffickers if there had been commensurate cooperation from other security outfits. The influx of private jets by powerful Nigerians who take off and land at various airports without proper security checks has equally fuelled the appalling security situation, particularly at the Lagos airport.

Piqued by the lawlessness of these few powerful Nigerians, the Director-General of the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA), Dr. Harold Demuren, quickly summoned a security meeting where he issued a stern warning to any one found flouting security at any of the airports.

Again, people are wont to ask how much the country spends yearly on aviation. The amount earmarked for aviation, a paltry N15 billion, is just too small to tackle aviation security, not to talk of infrastructure.

Civil aviation security exists to prevent criminal activity on aircraft and in airports. Criminal activity includes acts, such as hijacking (air piracy), damaging or destroying aircraft and nearby areas with bombs, and assaulting passengers and aviation employees.

The domestic wing of the Lagos airport, christened General Aviation Terminal (GAT), is a disaster waiting to happen. Not only is security lax at the area a major concern, the screening machines intermittently breaks down, raising fresh fears about insecurity in the area.

It was rumoured then that the ill-fated Bellview airplane crash in Lisa, Ogun State in 2005, which departed from the area could have been planted with explosives, considering the effect of the crash. The aircraft was said to have been blown apart mid air before its nose was entombed in Lisa forest.

However, the report of the crash is yet to be made public by the Accident Investigation Bureau (AIB).


Sunday, December 27, 2009

Mutallab Man Who Shamed Nigeria

FG Orders Full Investigation Into Nigerian's Attempted Attack On US Aircraft

World Condemns Action, As Aviation Chiefs Meet

FAAN Defends Security At Lagos Airport

By Marcel Mbamalu, Wole Shadare (Lagos), and Nkechi Onyedika (Abuja)
Nigerian Guardian

Twenty Three year-old Nigerian, Umaru Farouk Abdul Mutallab, put Nigeria on the global map of terrorism, when he tried to blow up a Northwest Airlines Flight 253, carrying 278 passengers and 11 crewmembers from Amsterdam, as it prepared to land in Detroit, just before noon on Christmas day.

The attempted suicide attack by Mutallab, the son of a former chairman of First Bank Nigeria Plc, Alhaji Umaru Mutallab, on the aircraft belonging to a United States airliner, Delta Airlines, drew rage across the globe, just as airport security across the world are daily devising means to improve on aviation security.

Consequently, Vice President Goodluck Jonathan yesterday, directed Nigerian security agencies to commence full investigation into the incident.

According to New York Times, young Mutallab, who was linked to the al-Qaeda, had tried to set off an explosive device aboard a U.S. passenger plane as it approached Detroit on Friday, but was overpowered by passengers and crew, as the aircraft landed safely. The suspect suffered extensive burns and was taken into custody. The passengers, two of whom suffered minor injuries, disembarked safely from the Delta Air Lines plane, which had departed from Amsterdam.

Reacting to the development yesterday in Abuja, Minister of Information and Communications, Prof. Dora Akunyili, said that Nigeria as a nation abhor all forms of terrorism and assured that Nigerian security agencies would cooperate with the American authorities in the on-going investigations.

A statement signed by the minister read in part, "The Federal Government of Nigeria received with dismay the news of an attempted terrorist attack on a US airline, we want to state very clearly that as a nation, and we abhor all forms of terrorism.

"The Vice President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Dr Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, has directed Nigerian security agencies to commence full investigation of the incident. While steps are being taken to verify the identity of the alleged suspect and his motives, our security agencies will cooperate fully with the American authorities in the on-going investigations. Nigerian government will be providing updates as more information becomes available."

Unconfirmed reports, yesterday, suggested that security agents might have invited Dr Umaru Abdul Mutallab, father of young Mutallab, for questioning over the incident. But efforts, by our reporters, to reach either the former chairman of First Bank or the security agencies to confirm the report of the invitation was not successful.

The Guardian later spoke with Celine Loader, the head of the Corporate Communications at the First Bank Plc, who said the bank had no official reaction to the development yet. "There is no official reaction yet, because we are still trying to investigate the report," said Loader.

The chief image-maker of the bank, however, declined comments on the progress made so far.

An information on the Daily News website yesterday quoted unidentified family members as saying that young Mutallab's father, Alhaji Umaru Mutallab, "a former minister and chairman of First Bank in Nigeria, is shocked that his son was even allowed to fly to the U.S." The top Nigerian banker was said to have alerted US authorities about his son's 'extreme religious views' months ago.

"The dad was meeting with security officials to discuss his son, identified as Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab, 23._The younger Mutallab was not on any no-fly list when he flew from Nigeria to Detroit through Amsterdam."

Meanwhile, top aviation chiefs, made up of the Director-General of the Nigeria Civil Aviation Authority, Dr. Harold Demuren, the Managing Director of the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (FAAN), Richard Aisuebeogun, Director of Airports Security, and other top security officials, yesterday held a closed door meeting in Lagos to unravel how a Nigerian, Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab, smuggled explosives, with the intention to blow up an aircraft belonging to United States airliner, Delta Airlines.

The action of the Nigerian said to be son of a former chairman of First Bank Nigeria Plc, Alhaji Umaru Mutallab, drew rage across the globe, just as airport security across the world are daily devising means to improve on aviation security.

According to reports, an attempted terrorist attack on a Christmas Day flight began with a pop and a puff of smoke - sending passengers scrambling to subdue a Nigerian man who claimed to be acting on orders from al-Qaeda to blow up the airliner, officials and travelers said.

The commotion was said to have begun as Northwest Airlines Flight 253, carrying 278 passengers and 11 crewmembers from Amsterdam, prepared to land in Detroit just before noon on Christmas day.

Passengers said they smelled smoke, saw a glow, and heard what sounded like firecrackers. At least one person climbed over others and jumped on the man, who officials say was trying to ignite an explosive device.

"It sounded like a firecracker in a pillowcase," said Peter Smith, a passenger from the Netherlands. "First there was a pop, and then (there) was smoke."

Smith said one passenger, sitting opposite the man, climbed over passengers, went across the aisle and tried to restrain the man. The heroic passenger appeared to have been burned.

"Afterward, the suspect was taken to a front-row seat with his pants cut off and his legs burned. Multiple law enforcement officials also said the man appeared badly burned on his legs, indicating the explosive was strapped there. The components were apparently mixed in-flight and included a powdery substance, multiple law enforcement and counterterrorism officials said.

Since September 11, 2001 when terrorists, acting for al-Qaida blew up World Trade Centre with passenger aircraft, the world took a proactive step to ensure maximum security, both before and after take-off, but this recent incident shocked the whole world.

Demuren, in a telephone interview with The Guardian yesterday, confirmed the meeting, but declined to give further insight into the outcome of the meeting.

He simply said that they had been able to confirm that the alleged terrorist was a Nigeria, saying, "I cannot say more than that. The Federal Government will issue a statement on that."

Efforts by The Guardian to know what the authority intends to do to tighten security at the nation airports met the brick wall, as he hurriedly said, "No comment and thank you very much."

A source, who spoke to The Guardian under a strict condition of anonymity, said that the meeting was called to appraise security lapses at the airport and ways to block all the lapses that might aid the carriage of explosives or dangerous weapons on board airliners.

It was not clear as at press time whether the suspect actually carried his explosives through the Murtala Muhammed International Airport, Lagos to Amsterdam, en-route Detroit.

Mutallab's itinerary shows that he boarded in Nigeria and went through Amsterdam en route Detroit.

Dutch Airline, KLM said yesterday that the connection in Amsterdam from Lagos, Nigeria, to Detroit involves a change in carrier and a change in aircraft.

Schiphol Airport, one of Europe's busiest with a heavy load of transit passengers from Africa and Asia to North America, strictly enforces European security regulations including only allowing small amounts of liquid in hand luggage that must be placed inside clear plastic bags.

Meanwhile, the White House in its reaction said it believed it was an attempted act of terrorism and stricter security measures were quickly imposed on airline travel.

Dutch anti-terrorism authorities said the U.S. has asked all airlines to take extra precautions on flights worldwide that are bound for the United States.

One law enforcement official said the man claimed to have been instructed by al-Qaeda to detonate the plane over U.S. soil, but other law enforcement officials cautioned that such claims could not be verified immediately, and said the man may have been acting independently - inspired but not specifically trained or ordered by terror groups.

Intelligence and anti-terrorism officials in Yemen said they were investigating claims by the suspect that he picked up the explosive device and instructions on how to use it in that country.

A spokesman for the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria, Akin Olukunle, said all passengers and their luggage are screened before boarding international flights. He also said the airport in Lagos cleared a U.S. Transportation Security Administration audit in November.

"We had a pass mark," Olukunle said. "We actually are up to standards in all senses."


Sunday, December 27, 2009

Aviation Terrorism: The Familiar Terrain

By Wole Shadare
Nigerian Guardian

Today, aviation security is high on the list of priorities of air travelers, the Federal Government, and the international air community. In the earliest days of aviation, however, security was only a minor concern.

The first recorded hijacking occurred in May 1930, when Peruvian revolutionaries seized a Pan American mail plane with the aim of dropping propaganda leaflets over Lima. No hijackings were then recorded until 1947.

Between that year and 1958, 23 hijackings mostly committed by eastern Europeans seeking political asylum, were reported. The world's first fatal hijacking took place in July 1947 when three Romanians killed an aircrew member.

The first major act of criminal violence against a U.S. airliner occurred on November 1, 1955, when Jack Graham placed a bomb in luggage belonging to his mother and killed all 44 people on board a Denver-bound plane. Graham had hoped to cash in his mother's life insurance policy; instead, he was sentenced to death. In January 1960, a heavily insured suicide bomber killed all aboard a National Airlines plane, sparking demands for the use of baggage-inspection devices.

Fidel Castro came to power in Cuba in 1959, and soon after, the number of hijackings began to grow. At first, flights were hijacked by those wishing to escape from Cuba. The pattern changed in May 1961, with the first American airliner diverted to Cuba. Other such incidents took place that summer, and the government began using armed guards on commercial planes when requested by the airlines or the FBI. In September, President John F. Kennedy signed legislation that prescribed the death penalty or at least 20 years' imprisonment for air piracy.

The skies remained relatively quiet until February 21, 1968, when a fugitive forced a DC-8 plane to fly to Cuba. This started a rash of hijackings in the United States that would last through 1972. Worldwide, the U.S. Department of Transportation placed the total number of hijackings from 1968 through 1972 at 364.

The international aviation community had earlier recognized the seriousness of air piracy. In 1963, the Convention on Offenses and Certain Other Acts Committed on Board Aircraft (known as the Tokyo Convention) had been drafted, requiring the prompt return of hijacked aircraft and passengers. In December 1970, the United States and 49 other nations signed the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft (Hague Convention). Ratified by the U.S. Senate in September 1971, it categorized hijacking as a criminal rather than as a political act. The 1971 Montreal Convention, which went into force in 1973, strengthened the earlier agreements.

Although most hijackings in the 1960s were to Cuba, in August 1969, Arab terrorists carried out the first hijacking of a U.S. aircraft flying outside the Western Hemisphere when they diverted an Israel-bound TWA aircraft to Syria . Another incident that October involved a U.S. Marine who sent a TWA plane on a 17-hour circuitous journey to Rome . This was the first time that FBI agents attempted to thwart a hijacking in progress and that shots were fired by the hijacker of a U.S. plane. Other violent incidents followed. In March 1970, a copilot was killed and the pilot and hijacker seriously hurt during a hijacking. The first passenger death in a U.S. hijacking occurred in June 1971.

Following the hijacking of eight airliners to Cuba in January 1969, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) created the Task Force on the Deterrence of Air Piracy. The Task Force developed a hijacker "profile" that could be used along with metal detectors (magnetometers) in screening passengers.

In October, Eastern Air Lines began using the system, and four more airlines followed in 1970. Although the system seemed effective, a hijacking by Arab terrorists in September 1970, during which four airliners were blown up, convinced the White House that stronger steps were needed.

On September 11, 1970, President Richard Nixon announced a comprehensive anti-hijacking program that included a Federal marshal program.

In early March 1972, the discovery of bombs on three airliners led President Nixon to speed certain FAA rulemaking actions to tighten airline security. In October, however, four hijackers bound for Cuba killed a ticket agent. The next month, three criminals seriously wounded the copilot of a Southern Airways flight and forced the plane to takeoff even after an FBI agent shot out its tires. These violent hijackings triggered a landmark change in aviation security. In December, the FAA issued an emergency rule making inspection of carry-on baggage and scanning of all passengers by airlines mandatory at the start of 1973. An anti-hijacking bill signed in August 1974, sanctioned the universal screening.

These stringent measures paid off, and the number of U.S. hijackings never returned to the worst levels before 1973. No scheduled airliners were hijacked in the United States until September 1976, when Croatian nationalists commandeered a jetliner. Two fatal bombings did occur, though: a bomb exploded in September 1974, on a U.S. plane bound from Tel Aviv to New York , killing all 88 persons aboard, and a bomb exploded in a locker at New York 's LaGuardia Airport in December 1975, killing 11. That bombing caused airports to locate lockers where they could be monitored.

In June 1985, Lebanese terrorists diverted a TWA plane leaving Athens for Beirut. One passenger was murdered during the two-week ordeal; the remaining 155 were released. This hijacking, as well as an upsurge in Middle East terrorism, resulted in several U.S. actions, among them the International Security and Development Cooperation Act of 1985 that made Federal air marshals a permanent part of the FAA workforce.

On December 21, 1988, a bomb destroyed Pan American Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland. All 259 people aboard the London -to- New York flight, as well as 11 on the ground were killed. Investigators found that a bomb concealed in a radio-cassette player had been loaded on the plane in Frankfort, Germany.

This tragedy followed an FAA bulletin issued in mid-November that warned of such a device and one on December 7 of a possible bomb to be placed on a Pan Am plane in Frankfort. Early in 2001, a panel of Scottish judges convicted a Libyan intelligence officer for his role in the crime.

Security measures that went into effect for U.S. carriers at European and Middle East airports after the Lockerbie bombing included requirements to x-ray or search all checked baggage and to match passengers and their baggage.

During and after the 1990s, the FAA sponsored research on new equipment to detect bombs and weapons and made incremental improvements to aviation security that included efforts to upgrade the effectiveness of screening personnel at airports. In 1996, two accidental airline crashes focused attention on the danger of explosions aboard aircraft, including those caused by hazardous cargo. The FAA's response included banning certain hazardous materials from passenger airplanes. The 1997 Federal appropriation to the FAA provided funds for more airport security personnel and for new security equipment.

In the last few years, airport security procedures were sometimes faulted by the media and by the Department of Transportation's Office of the Inspector General (OIG), an independent government office that assesses Federal programs and operations and makes recommendations. In 1999, for example, a report issued by the OIG criticized the FAA for being slow to limit unauthorized access to secure areas in airports, stating that its investigators were able to penetrate these areas repeatedly.

In 2000, it also faulted the agency for issuing airport identificationu sed to access secure airport areas without sufficient checks. But for the ten years following February 1991, there were no airline hijackings in the United States.

This lull was shattered on September 11, 2001, when terrorists hijacked four U.S. airliners and crashed three of them into buildings and one into the ground, causing the death of thousands.

This unprecedented attack resulted in an immediate and drastic heightening of air transportation security.

In November, the Aviation and Transportation Security Act gave the Federal Government direct responsibility for airport screening, which had previously been performed by the airlines and their contractors. Other provisions of the Act included the creation of a new Department of Transportation organization, the Transportation Security Agency, to oversee security in all modes of travel.

Western Oil Firms May Not Renew Nigerian Licenses--Shell to Sell Oil Fields

Daily Trust (Abuja)

Nigeria: Western Oil Firms May Not Renew Nigerian Licences--Shell to Sell Oil Fields

Jibrin Abubakar and Mohammed Shosanya
21 December 2009

Lagos — Western oil companies may not renew their operational licences in Nigeria, as Royal Dutch Shell launched a shake-up of its operations in Nigeria by offering oilfields valued at $5 billion for sale.

This, according to sources is coming owing to their dissatisfaction with the handling of the oil sector by the Nigerian government. They are also concerned about how the deregulation policy will work.

While the National Assembly is said to have promised to pass the Petroleum Bill into law before the end of this month, the date for the take off of deregulation is unknown.

Royal Dutch Shell, Exxon Mobil, Total and Chevron, which have dominated Nigeria's energy sector for decades, have criticised the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB), saying it could threaten billions of dollars of investment if it goes ahead in its current form.

Sources also say they are also concerned about Nigeria's new oil ally-China. China has offered to invest $50 billion for acquiring 6 billion barrels of oil reserves in the country.

"Chinese people are not buying fields...they want to acquire reserves in Nigeria. Specifically the application was to acquire reserves of 6 billion barrels which we are currently discussing. They are prepared to spend as much as $50 billion," special advisor to President Umaru Musa Yar'adua on energy matters, Emmanuel Egbogah had said.

Spokesman of the Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) Precious Okolobo, however said he could not comment on the matter when contacted on phone yesterday.

But the General Manager, Government and Public Affairs of Chevron Nigeria Limited(CNL) Femi Odumabo told this paper in a telephone interview that his company and other multinational oil companies are currently engaging in discussion with the Federal government and its relevant agencies on the Petroleum Industry Bill and the deregulation policy.

He did not comment on whether or not his company and other multinational oil companies would not renew their operating licence 'due to the issue at hand'.

"Discussions on the issue are currently ongoing with the Federal government. We are engaging in discussion with relevant government officials and agencies", he said.

Public Affairs Advisor of ExxonMobil Mr Yemi Fakayejo could not be reached on phone for comments.

Some provisions of the Petroleum Industry Bill specify that NNPC's main joint-ventures with Shell, Chevron, Total, ExxonMobil, and Agip would also be restructured into independent companies with new management when the bill becomes law leaving the companies with much uncertainty on how the new companies will operate, who will manage them, and how profits will be shared.

At the public hearing for the bill in August this year, Managing Director of Chevron Nigeria Limited Andrew Fawthrop said,"Some of the provisions in the bill are still open to interpretation. It is very important that we clarify that before it is codified".

Mark Ward, the Managing Director of Exxon Mobil Nigeria, said that the Bill, presently implied that all new planned (upstream) projects would be uneconomical, stressing that his company planned to invest $60 billion in Nigeria over several years. Another multinational oil company has recommended more than 200 amendments to the bill, while others have privately spotted dozens of concerns to the NNPC.

Amidst speculation that western oil companies are refusing to renew their licences, Royal Dutch Shell is auctioning its oilfields valued at up to $5 billion for sale. The auction comes as the National Assembly prepares to pass into law the controversial Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB).

Royal Dutch Shell, Exxon Mobil, Total and Chevron, which have dominated Nigeria's energy sector for decades, have criticised the Petroleum Industry Bill, saying it could threaten billions of dollars of investment if it goes ahead in its current form

Shell is the biggest western oil firm in Nigeria, the world's tenth largest producer, and has had operations here for 70 years.

It is understood that the company recently launched a formal sales process that is being overseen by Ann Pickard, head of Shell Nigeria, Times online report.

"They have been talking about this for a while but it has now kicked off," said a source close to the situation. "They are inviting proposals and circulating technical data on their fields." Shell's decision to reduce its reliance on Nigeria, which was once its primary growth engine, signals a huge shift, Times online report.

For decades it has been a mainstay of an industry that accounts for more than three-quarters of the Nigerian economy. It persisted despite rampant piracy and a long-running campaign of violence by militants against foreign workers.

The growing violence and a souring of relations with the government in recent years led the company to invest billions elsewhere to offset its dependence on the country.

With new projects in the Gulf of Mexico and Qatar near completion, it is understood that Peter Voser, Shell's chief executive, is now keen to reduce its position in Nigeria.

Sinopec, one of China's state-owned oil groups, has requested information. It is thought that indigenous companies such as Oando, Nigeria's largest independent group, and London-listed Afren, could also pick up some fields.

Halliburton: Ex-Minister Quizzed Over $6 Million Bribe

Halliburton: Ex-minister quizzed over $6m bribe

National News Dec 27, 2009

•How he collected the money — Bodunde
•I don’t know what he is talking about — Batagarawa
•Officials threaten panel’s job

By Kingsley Omonobi ,
Nigerian Vanguard

Abuja-A FORMER minister of state for defence, Mallam Lawal Batagarawa, has been quizzed by the Federal Government’s investigation panel probing the $190 million Halliburton scam following an allegation by a suspect that the ex-minister collected $6 million from him (suspect).

Sunday Vanguard had reported some months back that a former special assistant to ex-President Obasanjo, Bodunde Adeyanju, who was arrested and quizzed by the panel for allegedly sharing the Halliburton kickback, had told investigators that he actually collected $6million from the former group managing director of NNPC, Chief Jackson Gauis Obaseki, and handed over the money to Batagarawa.

With some prominent Nigerians who were invited and quizzed by the panel claiming that some accomplices were being treated as untouchables, the panel moved to invite Batagarawa to come and explain what he did with the money he was accused of collecting .

Sunday Vanguard gathered that when Bodunde was challenged to repeat in Batagarawa’s presence what he had said about him, he (Bodunde) insisted that he gave Batagarawa the money. The former minister of state, however, denied ever collecting such money from Bodunde.

At a point, the panel members told Bodunde to look at Batagarawa, eyeball to eyeball, and remind him (Batagarawa) how he collected the money. Bodunde, it was gathered, could not look Batagarawa in the face but insisted the former minister collected the $6million. The former minister was subsequently released from detention after some days of questioning.

*Officials scuttle panel’s proposed trip abroad
Meanwhile, Sunday Vanguard gathered that several months after the five-man panel concluded the Nigerian leg of its investigations and secured visas to travel abroad for the foreign leg of the investigation, some officials of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs appeared to have scuttled the travel arrangements.

The ministry officials were said to have delayed the briefs, questionnaires and information needed by the panel to do their work abroad for six months such that the visas issued in October with a December 4 deadline for the panel members expired with the panelists still in Nigeria. The briefs, questionnaires and information were supposed to be translated into Spanish, French and German.

In effect the trips can no longer take place this year, giving the international community the impression that the government of Nigeria’s talk about unearthing the truth about the Halliburton scam is mere political talk. Besides, brother of former head of state, Alhaji Abdulkadir Abacha, has refused to appear before the panel to answer questions about his alleged role in the scam.

The panel members had been scheduled to travel to France, Spain, Switzerland and the United Kingdom and Germany for two weeks to investigate how the monies were distributed, the codes used, how the facilitator and key foreign suspect, Jeffrey Tesler, allegedly tricked the Nigerian beneficiaries, as well as the extent of involvement of two former heads of state in the alleged sharing of the loot.

When it became clear that the Foreign Affairs Ministry officials were not forthcoming with the translation, for reasons best known to them, the panel then requested withdrawal of the documents and employed private experts that eventually carried out the translation but by then the visas had expired. N50million had been approved by President Umaru Yar’Adua, as far back as September, for the panel members to embark on the foreign leg of the investigations following the submission of an interim report on the in-country investigations.

It's Not Land Ownership, It's Utilisation

It’s not land ownership, it’s utilisation!

By Jonathan Kadzura
Courtesy of the Zimbabwe Sunday Mail

THE land reform programme, like the war of liberation, will never die away until total economic liberation is achieved.

The masses of Zimbabweans who fought for the liberation of this country will find their efforts well and conclusively rewarded not for themselves, but for their lineage and generations to come, only when the natural resources of this beautiful country become truly Zimbabwean, and this is exactly what the State President is persecuted for.

The land acquisition exercise is not and cannot be an event.

The world is watching to see if the country will navigate past the numerous landmines on this last stretch of our independence.

To the President, I must state categorically that even God’s only Son, Jesus, was sold for 30 pieces of silver.

Where is the Palestinian population today, again for 30 pieces of silver?

This scenario should not be allowed in Zimbabwe.

The war of liberation was fought on the principle of land recovery, hence the slogan “mwana wevhu”.

The slogan “one man one vote” in fact, meant not only recovering the land, but also the dignity of Zimbabweans.

Do you wish to remember how we were cheated out of our land through sweets and mirrors?

Now cash and cars have replaced the sweets and glasses.

The Fifth Zanu-PF National People’s Congress recently passed a strict and binding resolution that the land resettlement programme is irreversible and can never be reversed.

How practical and how right! This resolution is not and cannot be negotiated.

Zanu-PF must stand steadfast on this God-given principle and at the same time abide by its people-oriented inclination that the masses are the people and that leadership only represents those masses.

This President Mugabe so eloquently put across at the Congress.

It was not only clear but also embarrassing for those who thought that leadership was about people for leadership and not leadership for the people.

That is why the President clearly put it across that leadership must come from the people and that whoever emerges as a leader must, in fact, represent the people.

This is democracy, so he added, to applause from delegates attending the Congress. It is evident that the land reform was people-driven and not Government-driven.

The people in Chief Svosve’s realm were the first to demand their land back. This was just out of frustration.

They felt that after waging the war of liberation, the country had only obtained political leverage, something that meant very little to the people.

The traditional leadership was, in fact, fast in reminding the political leadership that the war was not for important podiums but for our land.

That is why the people — and not Government or the law — led calls for land redistribution.

Both the Government and the law came in the wake of what communities or society had determined.

After the people opened this door, society also expects the politicians and the law to put sufficient and fair instruments in place to govern land occupation and land utilisation.

I am one concerned. Why should millions of hectares of land go to waste because the land is under legal instruments that prohibit newly resettled farmers from getting on with the farming business?

Also the original settler farmer plants nothing because his tenure is equally undetermined.

The net liability in this case lies on the ordinary Zimbabwean who goes hungry because nobody worked the land.

Who gets the blame for this fiasco? Zanu-PF!

In my view, this situation requires an urgent solution and it is easy to get it if only we all work for a common objective.

Ask me.

Now I hear and read that US$31 million will be spent on yet another land audit.

What is it that the past three land audits failed to reveal that must now be unearthed by United States dollars?

What good would that money have made had it been channelled towards the purchase of agricultural inputs or to the private sector?

It is a total waste because all the information required is gathering dust on shelves.

But is the project about land really about the person or the personalities?

Kenya may have answers to these questions.

In my view, we should never wait for other people to show us our mistakes and move on to correct them for us.

The country should rather find out its own mistakes and move on to correct them.

This capacity we have — also another God-given resource in us.

The issue of multi-farm ownership must be openly discussed.

Is the question about how many farms a man holds or how much land is going to waste because nobody is working the land?
Greed is when one sits on a lot of land and never uses it.

If one man has 10 000 hectares of land that is actively producing food and raw materials for the nation, that man again, in my view, must be persuaded to get more land from the lazy people sitting on 100 hectares of land.

I think the issue should be about land utilisation and not ownership.
Some of us prefer being in factories producing yoghurts and chocolates, but the raw materials must be available.

Indeed, everyone is entitled to a piece of land. That is why we have the A1 scheme that may be considered as social or subsistence farming.

Commercial farming must be released to a lot of land and should be allowed to grow openly.

There is another side of the coin where only limited hectares are allowed per individual.

This practice is prevalent in some South American states and the Nordic countries.

The question whether we can measure up to this requirement and whether our circumstance is such that we need similar standards must be fully explored.

At the end of the day, let us not set our bars too high in a manner that turns them into moral impediments to what we need to achieve as a nation.

Again, I am only opening debate on these fundamental issues so that we can bury the idea of tracts of land that are not being used.
As usual, it is time for the family and today lunch is sadza and muboora unedovi. How Zimbabwean!

Resign, Group Tells President Yar'Adua of Nigeria

...Resign, Group Tells Yar'Adua

From Gordi Udeajah, Umuahia
Nigerian Guardian

The Coordinator of Movement For Change In Nigeria (MCN), Chief Sonny Iroche has suggested it was time President Yar'Adua quit office, voluntarily.

In a statement sent to The Guardian, at the weekend, he said: " It is time for President Yar'Adua to take a bow, resign his position as President and attend to his health, in the larger interest of Nigeria ".

"There is no doubt the Office of President and Commander-in-Chief of an emerging economy and a fissiparous country like Nigeria is very challenging, daunting and Herculean for even the healthiest of men; not to talk of a man, who from the onset of his presidency, was known to be ill.

"It is an entirely different matter, if, while in office, he suddenly fell ill. Our President was known to be ill ab initio; even as far back at his days as Governor of Katsina State.

" From our corporate experience and practice, new employees are made to undergo medical tests and are issued with medical certificates before they commence work. Not to talk of the President of a country in dire need of an energetic and focused leadership.

" A Nigerian President, at this time of our history, needs all the energy possible to lead Nigeria out of the doldrums. While our prayers and thoughts are with our President and the country, we strongly advise the President to save the over 150 million Nigerians, Africa and indeed the entire world, by resigning.

He prayed God to give the President the wisdom and enablement to do what is right, adding that when he resigns, the Constitution must take its course.

The Approaching End of the Slave-Built Economic Empire

The approaching end of the slave-built economic empire

AFRICAN FOCUS By Tafataona P. Mahoso
Courtesy of the Zimbabwe Sunday Mail

In How Europe Underdeveloped Africa, Walter Rodney documented the history of the construction of Western capitalism on African slave labour and African raw materials and minerals.

Now, Professor Bernard Magubane has documented the depth and extent of the criminal and racist defamation and dehumanisation of Africa and Africans which the Anglo-Saxons carried out in order to justify to themselves and to the world the African holocaust in slavery, colonialism and apartheid which made capitalism possible.

In Race and the Construction of the Dispensable Other, Magubane gives Africa and the African people a lesson which Zimbabwe needs in 2009.

In the short term Zimbabweans need to unite and defeat the illegal and racist sanctions imposed by the same Anglo-Saxon countries at the invitation of the MDC formations.

But more daunting is the long-term task of cleansing the name of Zimbabwe and Zimbabweans, the name of Africa and Africans, which the Anglo-Saxon powers criminally and falsely defamed with the help of journalists and the MDC formations.

As Magubane demonstrates in his book, Africans still struggle to overcome the demeaning and besmirching fabrications and stereotypes of 400 and 500 years ago.

The main vehicles then were a racist anthropology and a bastardised and racist Christian heresy about the origins and fate of humankind.

Today’s visual and digitalised anthropologist is the imbedded and sponsored journalist.

The false videos, films, web sites and e-mails which this new anthropologist and missionary of imperialism produces are not tucked away in museums and libraries like the tracts from old anthropology; they are beamed raw and direct into hundreds of millions of homes around the world.

Africa is still the butt of a globalised defamation industry which began in slavery.

This means that the MDC formations did not know what they were getting into when they agreed to lie about their own country and their own people in order to justify illegal sanctions and in order to earn sponsorship.

The Herald of December 21 2009 carried a story in which Finance Minister Tendai Biti seems to be surprised that the Anglo-Saxon countries whom the MDC formations begged to impose illegal and racist sanctions on Zimbabwe in 2000 are now using all sorts of excuses to justify keeping the sanctions in place.

The minister would now want the sanctions lifted immediately so that “the economic giant” which is Zimbabwe can emerge and play its rightful role among other nations.

The same Herald story reported that the Minister of State in the Prime Minister’s Office, Mr Gorden Moyo, has also realised now that 40 Zimbabwean companies have actually been “blacklisted”, which really means “whitelisted”, by the same Anglo-Saxon powers as a way of deepening and maintaining sanctions on Zimbabwe.

Then on December 23 the same paper reported that Nestlé Zimbabwe has just closed its Zimbabwe factories because of pressure from the illegal sanctions lobby of which the MDC formations have been a part for the last 10 years.

It is reported that the illegal sanctions lobby has a list of Zimbabwean farms which have been acquired by the State for resettlement as part of the African land reclamation movement.

It is those farms which the sanctions lobby believes should not be allowed to benefit from Western companies doing business here, such as Nestlé.

The intimate information about who was resettled on which acquired farms, just-like the intimate knowledge of who is supposed to be banned from travelling to the West, has been supplied by the MDC formations over the years.

Even MDC-T’s demand to install Roy Bennet as Deputy Minister of Agriculture is meant to facilitate access to intimate information which can be better deployed against Zimbabwe’s land revolution.

This duplicity explains why the MDC formations have not yet joined the majority of Zimbabweans to condemn and defeat the sanctions.

While Minister Biti pretends to condemn sanctions in some of his speeches, his own treatment of the agricultural sector and the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe in his 2010 budget has actually served to deepen the effects of sanctions from inside Government itself.

Therefore the two ministerial admissions that sanctions are part of a real economic embargo against the country show that we may have made a little bit of progress from the days when MDC-T leaders used to deny that Zimbabwe was under sanctions.

But The Herald stories reveal a much bigger problem with MDC-T than whether or not its leaders now realise that the illegal sanctions are a real economic war on the people.

This is the bigger problem:

Either the leaders of the MDC formations really believed that the Anglo-Saxon powers were their true and permanent “friends” who loved them and whose interest in Zimbabwe’s affairs was driven by that love, which love would cause them to put leaders of that party in power; or leaders of the MDC formations really believed that the Anglo-Saxon racists really wanted “democracy” in Zimbabwe which would arrive as soon as MDC leaders were sworn into office; or these leaders were so power-hungry that they would do anything to get into office, including inviting sanctions to be imposed on the people.

And now that they are in office, they want the sanctions removed so that they can enjoy the full fruits of office.

But Magubane’s book raises a bigger question: Even if the sanctions are defeated by the people, what are the MDC formations going to do to cleanse the name of Zimbabwe?

It appears the MDC leaders did not understand that they were getting entangled in something far much bigger and several centuries older than the MDC formations and the current myth of democratic change and human rights.

The myth of democratic change, human rights and freedom used by the Anglo-Saxon powers as the reason for the creation and existence of the MDC formations is just one more construction in a long series going back 500 years.

Anyone who understands the damage done through lies against Africa would not want to allow even one more fabrication to be spun against Africa again.

We happen to have entered a period in history when the slave-built Anglo-Saxon economic hegemony of the last 500 years is collapsing.

Zimbabwe happens to symbolise the reality of that collapse because of its direct defiance of Anglo-American intrusion and interference.

Therefore the extraordinary and global attention paid to Zimbabwe in the last 10 years is a particular consequence of global struggles and global history going back 500 years.

That history and its struggles are far much larger than Zimbabwe, far much bigger than President Robert Mugabe and Zanu-PF, far much broader than Zimbabwe’s war veterans and the African land reclamation movement.

That is why the whole world recently gathered at Copenhagen; that is why for the first time in a long time few people are confused as to who the real rogue states are and what havoc they have inflicted on the human race for 500 years.

I have said that the MDC formations do not understand that the democratic change, human rights and global freedom on which they were set up is just but the latest in a series of similar myths constructed in the last 500 years in order to enable Anglo-Saxons to cope with crises.

Let me describe the latest crisis first. It covers the period 1973 to date. In that period:

--Those states whose oil fuelled the Anglo-Saxon empire rebelled by setting up the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec);

--The United States suffered defeat in, and had to pull out of, South-East Asia militarily (1975);

--Although the Arab states were defeated in the Yom Kippur war of 1973 against the apartheid state of Israel, they did demonstrate that Israel could be defeated and Palestinians could be freed if the Arab states all united against the Western imperialist states backing Israel against Palestine.

--The UN General Assembly for the first time recognised as combatants in terms of the Geneva Conventions those African guerillas fighting for national liberation;

--Passage of the International Convention for the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid in 1973 opened the possibility that P. W. Botha, F. W. de Klerk, Ian Smith and their apartheid and UDI killers could be sent to The Hague to face trial for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Moreover, the Western arms suppliers and financiers of apartheid and UDI could be required to pay reparations to the African nations of the region which is now Sadc.

--As a result of the impending victories of African liberation movements, the Portuguese fascist regime and Portugal’s African empire collapsed.

This freed Angola and Mozambique and opened chances for intensifying the liberation struggles for Zimbabwe, Namibia and South Africa, leading to the beginning of the end of British hegemony in the region.

--The revolutionary climate created through these events gave the children of South Africa under apartheid the courage to stage the Soweto Uprising in 1976 at a great cost in lives. The brutality of the apartheid regime was exposed on camera to the whole world.

--Initially the response of imperialism came in the form of inquiries and books examining the future of the Southern African region. R. W. Johnson, a professor at Oxford, published How Long Will South Africa Survive. The Carnegie Foundation of the US commissioned a corporate inquiry whose report was significantly entitled South Africa: Time Running Out.

The problem for imperialism was that the inspiration for real democracy, for real human emancipation and popular sovereignty was not coming from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights or from the so-called “mature democracies” of the West, who, in fact, advocated “constructive engagement” with apartheid and supplied arms to all the white settler regimes in the region.

Real democracy, human emancipation and popular sovereignty in the region were inspired by Vietnam, Cuba and Algeria and they were materially supported by China, the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia and the Organisation of African Unity (OAU).

That is why, from the point of view of Anglo-Saxon hegemony, time was indeed running out.

So in response, imperialism did what it has done for the last 500 years: adjust its instruments of ideological aggression; design a fresh doctrine of human rights and democratic change; and figure out ways of defaming and dehumanising African freedom fighters as the new oppressors, while baptising the Anglo-Saxon killers and oppressors from UDI and apartheid as the latest champions of human rights and democratic change.

The MDC formations were sponsored in order to advance that Anglo-Saxon agenda.

World Oil Demand to Surge in 2010, Says OPEC

World oil demand to surge in 2010

Xinhua

THE world oil demand in 2010 would reach 85,13 million barrels per day (mb/d), increasing by 0,82 mb/d, or 0,98 percent compared to this year, according to the forecast made by Opec in its latest monthly oil market report in Vienna.

The Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec) has increased the world oil demand by 60 000 barrels a day in the new monthly report in comparison with the monthly report of last month.

While the forecast of world oil demand in 2009 from Opec remained the same as the previous monthly report, or 84,31 mb/d, it fell by 1,62 percent, or 1,39 mb/d compared to 2008.

The latest report said that the demand for crude oil next year in China, which would be firstly out of economic recession, would grow obviously.

It would be expected to increase by 4,5 percent. Besides, the growth rate of oil demand in the Middle East and North America would also reach 3,34 percent and 0,99 percent.

However, oil demand of the Western Europe and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, would be likely to keep declining, in which the Western Europe countries would reduce by 1,37 percent and Japan would even fall by 2,03 percent.

In the report, the demand for Opec crude oil in 2009 was estimated to follow a downward revision from 28,67 mb/d of the previous assessment to average 28,58 mb/d.

However, the report also predicted that demand for Opec crude oil would be expected to be 28,61 mb/d next year, an upward revision of around 10 000 barrels a day from the previous month and representing a slight increase of 30 000 barrels a day.

The upward revision of Opec in world oil demand was based primarily on the overall global economy recovery.

It was expected in the report that the world economy would get rid of decline next year, showing a growth of 2,9 percent from a contraction of 1,1 percent this year.

The economy of OECD-countries would expand by 1,3 percent next year from a contraction of 3,4 percent this year.

The US would also grow by 1,6 percent next year from a contraction of 2,5 percent in 2009.

Opec also estimated in its latest report that, the economic growth of China and India next year would reach 8,5 percent and 6,5 percent respectively.

In addition, the Euro zone economy would also expand from a contraction of 3,9 percent in 2009 to 0,6 percent in 2010. —

Saturday, December 26, 2009

PANW Editor Cited in Editorial: "Workers World Spreads Around the World"

Workers World spreads around the world

Published Dec 23, 2009 1:08 PM

A message from Workers World editors

With 2009 coming to an end, we thought it would be a good time to bring our readers up to date on the success Workers World is having in spreading a Marxist outlook from “inside the belly of the beast” around the world and in many languages.

It’s a few days early to really take a measure of how much WW’s latest coverage of the Copenhagen climate summit has been sent around and picked up by different periodicals and their Web sites. But the article Sara Flounders wrote on the Pentagon’s pollution has already been republished on globalresearch.ca and translated into Spanish for rebelion.org.

Abayomi Azikiwe, who also edits panafricannews.blogspot.com for his longtime readers, wrote on the African bloc leading a walkout in Copenhagen. This article too has already been picked up by two or three friendly blogs and Web sites. Azikiwe’s articles on Africa in WW have broadened their reach, along with deepening our coverage. In November, one on “The imperialist grab for Africa’s resources” made it across the Atlantic to the New Worker newspaper in Britain.

Azikiwe, besides giving Workers World strong coverage regarding the African continent, writes about news in Detroit, a city that has gone from being the center of the automobile industry to the center of the capitalist depression. His coverage included the FBI killing of Imam Luqman Ameen Abdullah, with these articles picked up by Uhuru News, the San Francisco Bay View newspaper and Axis of Logic.

One of Azikiwe’s articles, on “Municipal bonds and the crisis of the cities,” drew a response from someone trying to maximize the response of the Black community to the 2010 census in the hope of getting more aid to depressed inner-city areas like Detroit.

Flounders’ article on the Pentagon budget was probably the most translated of any WW article this past year — at least that we know of. Many of Flounders’ articles are also published by globalresearch.ca, but this one was also translated to Spanish by the Mundo Obrero crew and showed up in kaosenlared.net; was translated into Portuguese by resistir.info and used on odiario.info and also published in the print edition of Avante, the weekly newspaper of the Portuguese Communist Party; was translated to French for the michelcollon.info Web site; and was translated into Japanese and distributed to anti-war activists there.

Solidarity with Honduras

Solidarity actions often generate coverage. This happened with John Parker’s reports of the Viva Palestina trip to Gaza, which were published in addictedtowar.blogsome.com and the San Francisco Bay View in the summer; and with the articles by LeiLani Dowell on the solidarity trip to Honduras in October, which were republished on trinicenter.com and by the Singapore Democrat News, among others.

Larry Hales’s insightful essay, “Tale of two cities in Pittsburgh,” which was written while organizing against the G-20 summit in September, was republished by exchangemagazine.com, by islamonline.net and by michigancitizen.com, among others.

Considering the political ferment in Latin America following the upsurge of the Bolivarian movement, it is extremely important for a Marxist newspaper to interact with the large and active Marxist movement — made up of different tendencies — throughout Latin America and the Caribbean. Through most of the region, this means a discussion in Spanish. Thus it is invaluable that the Mundo Obrero team of editors are each week selecting suitable WW articles, translating them into Spanish, and disseminating them to newspapers, webzines, blogs and political parties.

The MO editors have translated WW articles on the war in Afghanistan, on developments in U.S.-China relations, on the labor movement in the U.S., on the economic crisis, on the struggle in Iran and more, and these have been republished on influential sites based in Spain and in Latin America. Berta Joubert-Ceci, one of the MO editors, has had her own analytical articles on Honduras and on a big struggle in Puerto Rico republished on these sites after MO has translated them.

Articles on the economic crisis by Fred Goldstein, author of “Low Wage Capitalism,” have been republished. These tend to reach an audience of communist and labor organizers as well as economists. When MO translates them to Spanish, as it did for a recent “Outline” of the crisis, it brought a positive reaction from a South American communist leader looking for educational material on developments in the U.S.

These are the examples brought to our attention or published on Web sites and other media we follow. We invite the use of our articles, and hope editors will inform us of their use. If readers know of other sites that are reproducing WW articles or have ideas of how we can reach out even further, please write to jcat@workers.org.

Articles copyright 1995-2009 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Page printed from:
http://www.workers.org/2009/world/ww_1231/

Notes on Ron Walters' Comments Criticizing Cuba

Ron Walters' Comments on Cuba Mirror the Same Narrow Perspectives on the Current Situation in the United States

Abayomi Azikiwe
Editor, Pan-African News Wire

Editor's Note: These continuing attacks on Cuba should not be surprising when coming from academics like Ron Walters who have moved further to the right politically over the last several decades. Walters' analysis of Cuba is representative of the distance that exist between this strata of the African American community and the realities of not only revolutionary Cuba but the concrete conditions prevailing inside the United States.

Intellectuals like Walters focus mainly on electoral politics involving the Democratic and Republican parties. Both of these parties are capitalist and imperialist and even the Democrats, who the Congressional Black Caucus represents in the US Congress, still supports the enemies of progress both domestically and internationally. Obama's internal and foreign policy reinforces existing social relations, race relations and class structures.

Obama has increased the defense budget, escalated imperialist involvement in Central Asia, the Horn of Africa, Latin America and the Middle-East. The Pentagon and the financial sector still controls the main domestic and foreign policy imperatives inside the United States. Despite the majority of people opposing the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, the military presence in these geo-political regions remains and expands.

Obama has been roundly condemned by progressives for ignoring the depression-like economic conditions that exist among the masses of African Americans in the United States. Even elements within the African American political elites such as the Congressional Black Caucus, the NAACP and the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, have pointed out that Obama's policies fail to address the historical, social and economic discrimination against their constituencies.

Consequently, the decisions that are made by a Democratic-controlled government, are the same racist, capitialist, imperialist and zionist projects that negate the interests of the majority of the people inside the United States as well as around the world.

With writers such as Walters placing so much emphasis on the Democratic and Republican parties, they ignore the political trends and movements that are taking place on a community-based level where real change is on the agenda. The struggles surrounding the economic crisis, the militarism of US imperialism and the continuing national oppression and racism under a purported "post-racial" era of the Obama, requires a national and class conscious movement to bring about fundamental change which can not be achieved under the present administration.

Below are notes from Walter Lippmann on Ron Walters, one of the American professors who signed a statement recently attacking revolutionary Cuba.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

These are a few notes on Ron Walters' recent Cuba commentary:
http://www.thedefen dersonline. com/2009/ 12/18/racist- or-revolutionary -cuba%E2% 80%99s-identity- is-at-stake/

Ron Walters' discussion of racism in Cuba raises important issues, but misses many aspects of the Cuban treatment of these complex and difficult themes. Perhaps Ron Walters is unfamiliar with the considerable Cuban literature on race, racism and how they play out in Cuba today. Coming from the United State of America, where racism is a central facet of the social and political culture, and where ignorance of Cuban reality is maintained through a travel ban, that's not surprising.

In my opinion, people from the United States ought to be careful to avoid thinking that the experiences and lessons of life in the US can be applied to every other country on earth without taking into account that country's history, culture and experiences. I believe Ron Walters has made that kind of error here.

The United States didn't elect its first Black president until 2008, in the third CENTURY after gaining its independence from the United Kingom. Cuba, which had and continues to have racial problems of its own, elected its first black president in 1940, at a time when the island had only achieved formal and juridical, but not practical nor actual independence, from the United States of America. Actual independence, I would argue, only began on January 1, 1959, with the triumph of the Cuban Revolution.

Though I am non-Black, and can't discuss racism with the same personal experience foundation that blacks can, I've attempted to follow these issues for many years. I've traveled to Cuba and stayed for extended periods of time. In addition, I direct an Internet-based news service, CubaNews, available at http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/CubaNews/

Part of the work of the CubaNews list is to locate Cuban materials on these themes, and to make translations of them for the English-speaking public. Even as fierce an opponent of the Cuban Revolution as Carlos Moore has found himself citing my work and my personal website regarding these issues, as you can find in his recently-published autobiography, PICHON. (see the footnotes to the book)

Among the accomplishments of the CubaNews list has been locating and translating from Spanish to English articles on racism, a continuing problem, from the contemporary Cuban media. I'll cite a few examples and hope that Ron Walters, and anyone else interested in these matters, will take a look at what Afro-Cuban authors have had to say about them. Citations below.

Thank you,

Walter

Esteban Morales: Cuban Color
http://www.walterlippmann.com/docs2809.html

Esteban Morales: Challenges of the Racial Problem in Cuba:
http://www.walterlippmann.com/docs2296.html

Esteban Morales: Anti-Cuban Subversion - The Race Issue
http://www.walterlippmann.com/docs1516.html

Miguel Barnet: Preserving Memory:
http://www.walterlippmann.com/docs2091.html

David Gonzalez and Walterio Lord:
Some Quick Comments on Carlos Moore's PICHON:
http://www.walterlippmann.com/ docs2346. html

The Independent Party of Color:
http://www.walterlippmann.com/docs2080. html

The Teachings and Lineage of Walterio Carbonell:
http://www.walterlippmann.com/docs1911.html

Esteban Morales: Malcolm X - An Unyielding Revolutionary:
http://www.walterlippmann.com/docs1389. html

Fernando Martinez Heredia: Malcolm X Still Speaks to Us
http://www.walterlippmann.com/docs2430.html

Fernando Martinez Heredia: The Meaning of a Centennial
http://www.walterlippmann.com/docs2127.html

Fernando Martinez Heredia:
Social diversity is not a weakness of the nation,
but a very important element of its wealth.
http://www.walterlippmann.com/docs1769.html

Alberto N. Jones: Unmasking the Promotors of Racial War in Cuba
http://www.walterlippmann.com/docs1533.html

There are many, many more, but these are a few to get an interested reader started.

Finally, Makani Themba-Nixon of the Praxis Project, one of the sixties signatories to the letter, has publicly withdrawn her signature.

Walter Lippmann
Los Angeles, California

Federal War Spending Exceeds State Government Outlays

Federal War Spending Exceeds State Government Outlays

By Sherwood Ross On December 23, 2009 @ 3:04 pm
In Nation

The U.S. spends more for war annually than all state governments combined spend for the health, education, welfare, and safety of 308 million Americans.

Joseph Henchman, director of state projects for the Tax Foundation of Washington, D.C. says the states collected a total of $781 billion in taxes in 2008.

For a rough comparison, according to Wikipedia data, the total budget for defense in fiscal year 2010 will be at least $880 billion and could possibly top $1 trillion. That’s more than all the state governments collect.

Henchman says all American local governments combined (cities, counties, etc.) collect about $500 billion in taxes. Add that to total state tax take and you get over $1.3 trillion. This means Uncle Sam’s Pentagon is sopping up nearly as much money as all state, county, city, and other governmental units spend to run the country.

If the Pentagon figure of $1 trillion is somewhat less than all other taxing authorities, keep in mind the FBI, the various intelligence agencies, the VA, the National Institutes of Health (biological warfare) are also spending on war-related activities.

A question that describes the above and answers itself is: In what area can the Federal government operate where states and cities cannot tread? The answer is: foreign affairs—raising armies, fighting wars, conducting diplomacy, etc. And so Uncle Sam keeps enlarging this area. His emphasis is not on diplomacy, either.

For every buck spent by the State Department, which gets some $50 billion a year, the Pentagon spends $20. As for the Peace Corps, its budget is a paltry $375 million—hardly enough to keep the Pentagon elephant in peanuts.

Nobel Prize economist Joseph Stiglitz and finance authority Linda Bilmes write in their “The Three Trillion Dollar War”(W.W. Norton), “defense spending has been growing as a percentage of discretionary funding (money that is not required to be spent on entitlements like Social Security), from 48 percent in 2000 to 51 percent today. That means that our defense needs are gobbling up a larger share of taxpayers’ money than ever before.”

And they add, “The Pentagon’s budget has increased by more than $600 billion, cumulatively, since we invaded Iraq.” With its 1,000 bases in the U.S. and another 800 bases globally, the U.S. truly has become a “Warfare State.” Today, military-related products account for about one-fourth of total U.S. GDP. This includes 10,000 nuclear weapons. Indeed, the U.S. has lavished $5.5 trillion just on nukes over the past 70 years.

No other nation has anything remotely like this menacing global presence. The Pentagon strengthens its grip by running joint “training” exercises with the military of 110 other nations, including outright dictatorships that suppress internal unrest.

The U.S. spends more on weaponry than the next dozen nations combined and is by far the No. 1 world arms peddler. “The government employs some 6,500 people just to coordinate and administer its arms sales program in conjunction with senior officials at American embassies around the world, who spend most of their ‘diplomatic’ careers working as arms salesmen,” writes Chalmers Johnson in “Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire(Henry Holt).”

Johnson goes on to say the U.S. military establishment today is “close to being beyond civilian control” and that despite its ability to “deliver death and destruction to any target on earth and expect little in the way of retaliation” it demands more and newer equipment “while the Pentagon now more or less sets its own agenda” and “monopolizes the formulation and conduct of American foreign policy.”

How long will it be before this tyrannical, anti-democratic, colossus that is sucking up as much money for war as all states, counties and cities spend on peace—and which straddles the globe, boosts dictators, and beats the war drums—turns on its own people?

Sherwood Ross formerly worked for The Chicago Daily News and other major dailies and as a columnist for wire services. He currently runs a public relations firm for “worthy causes.” You can reach him at sherwoodross10@gmail.com

Article printed from The Public Record: http://pubrecord.org

URL to article: http://pubrecord.org/nation/6376/federal-spending-exceeds-state/

Friday, December 25, 2009

Former Colonial Power France Warns of Guinea Civil War

France warns of Guinea civil war

Guinea could face a civil war if the country's military leader returns home, France's foreign minister has said.

Bernard Kouchner told French MPs that Moussa Dadis Camara should remain in Morocco where he is in hospital after an assassination attempt.

Earlier, the European Union toughened its sanctions against Guinea.

It froze the assets of members of the military government and banned European companies from exporting equipment that could be used for state repression.

The number of Guineans covered by a travel ban imposed in October, when the EU also brought in an arms embargo, has also nearly doubled.

The move followed a leaked UN report on Monday which said that Capt Camara should be charged with crimes against humanity over the killing of more than 150 opposition protesters at a stadium in September.

It said the coup leader bears "direct criminal responsibility" for the killings.

'Getting better'

Earlier this month Capt Camara, who came to power a year ago after the death of long-time leader Lansana Conte, was shot and wounded by one of his own soldiers on 3 December.

He was flown to Morocco for treatment and has not yet returned to Guinea - fuelling rumours that he was seriously injured.

"I hope that Mr Dadis Camara stays in his bed in Morocco and does not return home as his return would be capable of triggering a civil war that we really don't need," Mr Kouchner told the French parliament.

But a senior Guinean diplomat told the AFP news agency that the junta hoped Capt Camara would be back soon.

"He is doing better and intends to return to Conakry as quickly as possible," said Mamadouba Diabate, Guinea's ambassador to Morocco.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/africa/8428025.stm
Published: 2009/12/23 11:39:32 GMT


Guinea's erratic military ruler

Moussa Dadis Camara, Guinea's somewhat eccentric military leader, was a virtually unknown army captain when he seized power in December 2008.

But he captured the imagination of a country desperately seeking change after the death of long-time leader Lansana Conte, who had also taken charge in a coup in 1984.

His popularity grew as he promised genuine democracy in the country, including a safe transition period and then presidential elections in which he would not stand.

He galvanised support from politicians, civil society groups and voters. Although both the West African regional body Ecowas and the African Union initially suspended Guinea, they have been generally supportive of his leadership and efforts to bring democracy.

In the first few months of his leadership, Capt Camara sought to further boost his popularity through a very public crackdown on the Guinean drug-trafficking industry.

Members of a trafficking ring were arrested and then quizzed on live television by the military leader himself.

Among those who admitted to drugs trafficking was the former president's son, Ousmane Conte.

Capt Camara's outlandish approach seemed a breath of fresh air after years of failed political promises.

He even made troops from the elite presidential guard beg on their knees for forgiveness on national TV for roughing up a general in July.

But his increasingly erratic leadership style and unpredictable behaviour has come in for criticism.

On several occasions, he has ordered politicians, civil society leaders and members of the public to shut up or even leave meetings, and is reported to have humiliated several foreign ambassadors.

UN peacekeeper

The BBC's Alhassan Sillah in Conakry says the military leader has often spoken of his humble beginnings.

He was born in 1964 in the village of Koure in the far south-east of Guinea, a forest area near the border with Liberia and Ivory Coast.

He moved to the capital, Conakry, without his family in order to further his studies, and claims to have sold kola nuts in the street to make ends meet.

He studied law and economics at the Gamal Abdel Nasser University of Conakry before joining the military in 1990. His military career was unremarkable, and included serving as United Nations peacekeeper in Sierra Leone in 2001-2002.

He never rose beyond the rank of captain, a position he gained following a mutiny he helped organise in February 2007.

He was also a leading player in a mutiny in May 2008, when rioting soldiers forced the government to pay overdue wages.

Captain Camara was also head of the Guinean army's fuel supplies unit, a position he used to gain a reputation for generosity with fellow military men.

Charade?

Yet he was little known outside military circles before December 2008, when six hours after Mr Conte's death, he appeared on state television, announcing a military coup d'etat. Several days later, he declared himself president.

Following the coup, he said he had not come to power by chance, listing a patriotic spirit and generosity among his leadership qualities.

His popularity has now dwindled, as he appears to be reneging on his promises of a transition to democracy and has shown signs of wanting to hold onto power.

He has recently indicated he might stand for president in the 2010 polls.

Captain Camara is known to be very close to the Conte family, and has several times spoken publicly of Conte's contribution to the country.

Despite the public dressing down of the former leader's son, no drug charges have been brought against him.

And it has led some critics to dismiss the television interrogations - and his promises of wanting democracy for Guinea - as a charade.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/africa/8280880.stm
Published: 2009/09/29 13:43:35 GMT

Nigerian Bar Association Warns of Crisis Surrounding Illness of President Yar'Adua

Yar’Adua: Okocha warns over constitutional crisis …says Aondoakaa misleading Nigerians

Nigerian Vanguard
National News Dec 25, 2009
By Ise-Oluwa Ige

ABUJA—Former President of the Nigerian Bar Association, NBA, Chief O C J Okocha, SAN, yesterday warned that the nation might be heading towards a grave constitutional crisis and total collapse if the health problem of President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua is not properly handled by relevant authourities.

President Yar’Adua was flown out of Nigeria on 23 November, 2009 to King Faisal Specialist Hospital in Saudi Arabia where he has since been receiving medical attention for acute pericarditis (inflammation of the heart’s lining).

He jetted out of the country without informing both the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives about his inability to discharge the functions of his office and has spent more than one month outside the country.

During his absence, a number of state duties having to do with release of monies for the running of government machineries which the 1999 constitution directly empowers him to do are suffering while in less than one week from today, the nation’s Chief Justice, Justice Kutigi would bow out of the bench with no one to swear in his successor, Justice Katsina Iyorger Alu.

Challenges Aondoakaa

The ex-NBA Chief who sounded the warning of imminent constitutional crisis and perhaps total collapse of the Nigerian state if necessary steps are not taken yesterday also descended on the Federation Attorney-General, Chief Michael Aondoakaa, SAN, for allegedly misleading the entire world to the effect that President Yar’Adua is empowered by the 1999 constitution to govern the country from anywhere in the world. He challenged Aondoakaa to point to the section of the 1999 constitution which so indicated.

Hear him: “The 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria which is our current constitution does not make any such position.

“And I will invite the Attorney-General of the Federation to point to the section of the constitution which expressly or by necessary implication indicates that the president can exercise the duties and functions of his office from anywhere in the world outside Nigeria and in such a situation that we have in our hands when he has been out of the country for over 28 days.

“I don’t know what law or what section of the constitution the Attorney-General is referring to and I will like him to point out to Nigerians, recognizing that he is the Attorney-General of the Federation and not Attorney-General for President Yar’Adua or Attorney-General for PDP.

“He should point to the section of the constitution that so indicates. “In all my humble searches throughout the constitution, I have not seen such section,” he said.

Sympathises with Yar’Adua

He said though he sympathized with President Yar’Adua over his ill-health and wished him quick recovery, he nonetheless stated that state matter is not a matter of sentiment “because what needs to be done must be done.”

He urged the members of the National Assembly to seek legal advice on whether the absence of President Yar’Adua from his duty post for more than 30 days when he is not on leave and when he had not handed over to his vice is not an impeachable offence.

He said if impeaching President Yar’Adua would make Nigeria move forward, he said it would be a right step in the right direction.

African Union Worries Over Sudan Distrust Between North and South

Friday, December 25, 2009

African Union worries over Sudan distrust

Nigerian Guardian

THE African Union yesterday expressed concern at the lack of trust between Sudan's north and south over the implementation of their peace agreement, agency reports indicated

The Agence France Presse (AFP) reported that the AU's Peace and Security Council said in a statement following a mission to Sudan last month that the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) that ended two decades of north-south civil war needed to be "re-energised".

The council "expresses concern at the continuing lack of confidence between the National Congress Party (north) and the Sudan Peoples' Liberation Movement (south) regarding the implementation of the CPA," the statement said.

The statement said concern was heightened by "the challenges faced by the Sudan in both the implementation of the CPA and the upcoming elections in April 2010, as well as the preparations for the referendum."

The 2005 internationally-brokered peace deal provides for a referendum to be held in 2011 in which semi-autonomous southern Sudan will decide whether or not to become fully independent.

The AU Peace and Security Council said it was establishing a committee to help address the most pressing challenges.

Tensions have been running high between north and south, still divided by the religious, ethnic and ideological differences over which the 1983-2005 civil war was fought.

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Obama Administration Curbs African Participation in Trade Program

US curbs African trade benefits

US President Barack Obama has stopped Madagascar, Guinea and Niger from receiving trade benefits for a year.

He said they had failed to make "continual progress" in meeting US requirements for a programme designed to create jobs in Africa.

Mr Obama said that each of the countries "has experienced an undemocratic transfer of power" meaning they did not satisfy the criteria.

However, Mauritania was re-instated to the programme.

The Africa Growth and Opportunity Act was set up in 2000 to offer "tangible benefits" for African countries trying to adapt their economies to a free market.

In order to take part, countries much show they are working towards, among other things, introducing the rule of law and political pluralism, the elimination of barriers to US trade and investment and efforts to combat corruption.

In Niger, President Mamadou Tandja refused to give up office at the end of his term, while both Guinea and Madagascar have both seen military-backed coups.

A coup took place in Mauritania last year, but an election was held this year that, although it returned the coup leader Gen Mohamed Ould Abdelaziz to power, was deemed by observers to be transparent.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/business/8429670.stm
Published: 2009/12/24 10:53:38 GMT

Niger Vows to Arrest Dissidents

Niger vows to arrest dissidents

Niger has reactivated arrest warrants against three exiled opposition leaders - including a former president.

The move jeopardises talks aimed at ending a crisis sparked when President Mamadou Tandja changed the constitution so he could stand for a third term.

Opposition delegates were taking part in talks because the government agreed to suspend the arrest warrants.

This week regional group Ecowas, mediating the talks, said it no longer recognised Mr Tandja's authority.

And on Wednesday the US suspended aid and announced it was imposing travel bans on senior officials.

Had he honoured his term limits, Mr Tandja would have stepped down as president on Tuesday.

No deal in sight

Minster of Justice Garba Lompo announced the arrest warrants would be activated for former President Mahamane Ousmane, former Prime Minister Hama Amadou and Mahamadou Issoufou, the leader of the main opposition party.

"From this day onwards all those people having warrants against them will be arrested if they come to Niger," said Mr Lompo.

The BBC's Idy Baraou, in Niamey, says few people expect the crisis talks to go any further.

He says the opposition wants to get rid of Mr Tandja at all costs, and now the government has struck back there seems to be no compromise on the horizon.

Opposition groups have described the president's move to stay in power in the uranium-rich nation as a coup.

But his supporters say he should remain as he has brought financial stability to one of the world's poorest nations.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/africa/8429739.stm
Published: 2009/12/24 12:48:12 GMT

United Nations Security Council Action Shameful, Says Eritrea

UN action shameful, says Eritrea

Eritrea has labelled UN sanctions imposed on Wednesday as shameful, and denied allegations that it arms Islamist militants in Somalia.

Eritrea's UK ambassador Tesfamichael Gerahtu told the BBC that the sanctions were illegal and would only worsen the problems in the Horn of Africa.

The Security Council imposed an arms embargo, travel bans and asset freezes on top Eritrean officials.

Somalia's beleaguered UN-backed government welcomed the sanctions.

Islamist insurgents have asserted control over most of the country, leaving the government with authority in only small parts of the capital, Mogadishu.

US accusations

But Mr Tesfamichael said the accusations made by the country's critics were inconsistent.

"Originally it was said we had soldiers and then later came military support and now all of a sudden after certain discussions and opposition they started to talk about political, military and logistical support," he told the BBC's World Today programme.

"Now we are 100% sure that we have never, never, never supplied military equipment or otherwise to the extremists in Somalia."

Eritrea's neighbouring countries and regional blocs including the African Union had been lobbying for sanctions for most of the year.

The resolution demands that the country stops "arming, training and equipping armed groups and their members, including al-Shabab, that aim to destabilise the region".

As a result of the Security Council vote, Eritrea becomes the first new country to be subjected to UN sanctions since they were imposed on Iran in 2006.

The US said it had sought talks with Eritrea for months, but the country had failed to act on its promises.

The UN has frequently expressed concern about the flow of arms in to Somalia, where hard-line Islamists of al-Shabab and Hizbul-Islam are battling with government forces for control of the capital Mogadishu.

Somalia has been subject to a UN arms embargo for many years, but weapons are still freely available in the Mogadishu weapons market.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/africa/8429568.stm
Published: 2009/12/24 09:58:56 GMT

Scores Killed in Iraq Bombings

Thursday, December 24, 2009
20:33 Mecca time, 17:33 GMT

Scores killed in Iraq blasts

A twin bomb attack occured near a bus stop in Hilla

Three bomb blasts in Iraq have killed more than 30 people and injured 75 others.

Officials said that a double explosion struck near a bus station in Babil province on Thursday, killing 14 policemen and a provincal councillor.

The first bomb, in a car, was said to have exploded at about 2pm (1100GMT) in Hilla, the provincial capital about 95km south of the capital Baghdad.

Another blast came about 15 minutes later when police arrived.

The authorities said that the attacks targeted Shia pilgrims who gathered near the bus station to mark Ashura, a commemoration of the death of the Prophet Muhammad's grandson, Hussein.

In northeastern Shia area of Sadr City in Baghdad, a bomb planted near a funeral tent killed eight people and wounded another 33.

Ahmed Rushdi, a journalist in Baghdad, told Al Jazeera: "The balsts happened nearly at the same time.

"They were not by the hand of al-Qaeda - they were not suicide bombers, but mostly car bombs and bombs beside cars."

Also on Thursday, a bomb blast also killed two people and injured four others in the Shia sacred city of Karbala, about 100 kilometres south of Baghdad, police said.

On Wednesday, six people were killed and another 43 people were injured in Baghdad in three explosions targeting Shias.

Thousands of Shias are expected to converge on the central city of Karbala for the December 27 Ashura holiday to mourn the Prophet Muhammad's grandson, Imam Hussein, killed by armies of the caliph Yazid in 680 A.D..

More than 25,000 security personnel have been assigned to protect pilgrims during the celebrations.

Source: Al Jazeera and agencies

Mary J. Blige: I Was Just Stopping Brawl Between My Husband and Brother

Mary J. Blige: I was just stopping brawl between my husband, Kendu Isaacs, and my brother

BY George Rush
DAILY NEWS GOSSIP COLUMNIST
Thursday, December 24th 2009, 7:31 PM

Mary J. Blige wants to damp down the drama over that fight at her record release party Tuesday night.

Contrary to claims that the hip-hop diva punched her husband, Kendu Isaacs, at a Chelsea club, Blige tells the Daily News she was simply trying to stop a brawl between Isaacs and her brother.

"Mary was not fighting with her husband," said Blige spokeswoman Karynne Tencer. "Her husband and her brother got into an altercation that turned into a fight. Mary went to break up the fight."

Tencer didn't immediately know the name of Blige's brother or the reason for the row.

Club security helped the Grammy Award winner pull the men apart, who also disputed reports that Isaacs' lip was bleeding.

"Nobody was bleeding," Tencer said.

Blige also denied she angrily compared Isaacs with notorious R&B star Chris Brown, who belted girlfriend Rihanna in February.

"She never mentioned Chris Brown," Tencer said. "Mary and Kendu went home together."

Blige had hoped the public wouldn't hear about the ugly scene at M2 Ultralounge, where she was celebrating her new album, "Stronger with Each Tear."

But after sources claimed she had smacked Isaacs because he was supposedly flirting with a waitress, Blige decided to set the record straight, Tencer said.

The publicist said the couple is celebrating Christmas with their three children on the East Coast.

"They're as happy as can be," Tencer said.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2009/12/24/2009-12-24_mary_j_blige_i_was_just_stopping_brawl_between_my_husband_kendu_isaacs_and_my_br.html#ixzz0afRvlCHd


Don't pull a Chris Brown stunt, Mary J. Blige warns hubby after smacking him

BY George Rush
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER
Thursday, December 24th 2009, 4:00 AM

Mary J. Blige gave her husband a stern warning not to retaliate after striking him for checking out a waitress, witness say.

Mary J. Blige gave her husband a stern warning not to retaliate after striking him for checking out a waitress, witness say.

Hip-Hop diva Mary J. Blige smacked her husband for checking out a waitress at her CD release party this week and warned him, "You ain't going Chris Brown on me," witnesses said.

The "No More Drama" songstress lashed out at hubby Kendu Isaacs at the Tuesday night party at the M2 Ultralounge in Chelsea, witnesses said.

One partygoer told the Daily News that the 38-year-old Grammy winner flew into a jealous rage because Isaacs was paying too much attention to a waitress at the club.

"Mary hauled off and smacked him," the source said.

Blige then warned Isaacs not to even think about retaliating. "She said, 'You ain't going to go Chris Brown on me, are you?'" according to a source.

Brown beat up ex-girlfriend Rihanna in June after she caught him reading a text from an old flame. The now-infamous incident led to Brown pleading guilty to felony assault charges.

Blige, who is promoting her new album "Stronger With Each Tear," denied Wednesday night that the incident with her husband took place.

"They're as happy as can be," spokeswoman Karynne Tencer said. "They're spending the holidays together with their three children. Everything's great."

A friend of Blige suggested that some "haters" at the club may have "misunderstood a joke Mary and Kendu were sharing."

grush@nydailynews.com

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2009/12/24/2009-12-24_dont_pull_a_chris_brown_stunt_blige_warns_hubby.html#ixzz0afTQF1Cv

Zimbabwe News Update: No Prosperity Without Unity; Christmas Cheer is Back

No prosperity without unity: President

Herald Reporter

PRESIDENT Mugabe has called for unity in the inclusive Government for its macro-economic policy designed to turn around the country’s economic fortunes to realise desired results.

This follows the launch of an economic blueprint, the Three-Year Macro-Economic Policy and Budget Framework for 2010-2012, on Wednesday, also known as the Short-Term Emergency Recovery Programme (STERP) II.

In a preface to the 413-page economic policy and budget framework, the President underscored the need to preserve unity in the inclusive Government for the benefit of the nation.

"For this policy framework to succeed, it is of paramount importance that the inclusive Government is preserved and sustained, in the interest of our people whom we serve.

"For it is only through unity of purpose that we can defend the gains of our independence and chart our destiny as an independent and sovereign state," he said.

President Mugabe said the formation of the inclusive Government in February this year and the launch of STERP as its economic blueprint in March, a number of achievements were made in the economic domain, particularly in achieving some macro-economic stability.

"However, notwithstanding these developments, our economy for the past decade has withstood a number of socio-politico-economic challenges that have not been fully resolved under STERP.

"These challenges are not insurmountable. Hence, the need for great resolve and commitment on the part of Government and the country at large to unite in the face of these challenges," he said.

The Government’s commitment to reform, President Mugabe said, had managed to stabilise the macro-economic environment.

"However, the challenge in going forward is to anchor sustained growth and development on the macro-economic stability that has been achieved to date.

"This will be done through increased production in the agriculture, mining, manufacturing and other key sectors of the economy," he said.

President Mugabe said STERP II would build on the macro-economic stability attained under STERP to achieve a robust economy necessary for the socio-economic transformation of the people over the next three years to 2012.

In his foreword, Finance Minister Tendai Biti also called for political will at all levels of Government and a commitment by stakeholders to implement agreed policies and public ownership and effective participation in the implementation of the framework agenda.

"It is my strong conviction that once these ingredients are in place, we will be able to turn around this economy and indeed rebuild and reposition Zimbabwe to its rightful place within the community of nations," Minister Biti said.

Among the objectives of the Macro-Economic Policy and Budget Framework are: sustaining macro-economic stabilisation and consolidating STERP; support for rapid growth and employment creation and ensuring food security.

It also seeks to restore basic services, encouraging public

and private sector investment, promoting regional integration, restoring basic freedoms and restoring international relations.

A review of STERP, since its launch nine months ago, indicates mixed results with progress in some areas, while there are some outstanding issues and challenges.

Achievements in the past nine months include reduction of inflation to negative levels, removal of price distortions, improved management of public resources, recovery of basic public service provisions, normalisation of financial services, and re-engagement and confidence building with the international community.

Government managed to resuscitate business activities and a subsequent improved supply response.

Some international organisations, among them the International Monetary Fund, have given a nod to a number of sound fundamental economic policies put in place by the inclusive Government.

The policy was launched by Deputy Prime Minister Thokozani Khupe on Wednesday.


Christmas cheer is back

By Lloyd Gumbo and Vallery Chingono
Zimbabwe Herald

MOST families appear ready for a first-class Christmas feast today, with supermarkets still crowded yesterday, but are going easy on presents and concentrating on practical items like school uniforms and work clothes.

As Zimbabwe climbs out of the economic doldrums, most said they wanted a slap-up Christmas, and reckoned they could afford it, their first for several years.

But most also wanted to get through January and ensure their children went to school. Shops selling luxury items were starting to discount prices yesterday, rather than wait for the January sales.

Even the banks co-operated. Bank queues were negligible yesterday and those wishing to withdraw money could do so very quickly.

The serious spike in cash demand last week, that triggered long queues and limits on withdrawals, is now over, at least until the January pay week.

The only sour note came from bus companies and thieves.

Bus owners were not only keeping the profiteering fares they introduced a week ago, but were unable to meet demand on many routes.

The Mbare Musika long-distance bus terminus was chaotic.

Bus operators increased fares taking advantage of the festive season which saw many people avoiding "expensive" buses for private vehicles thereby exposing themselves to robbers who take advantage of the transport blues and masquerade as Good Samaritans.

Passengers who intended to travel to areas like Chinhoyi, Karoi, Centenary, Guruve and Kariba were still stranded at the terminus around 11am, since there were no buses.

"We arrived here around 5am, but since we arrived only one bus has come to the rank and it’s now uncertain if the buses are coming anymore because we have been waiting for hours and there is no communication from the bus operators," said a man travelling to Guruve.

At the bus stop along the Harare-Masvi-ngo Road pupularly known as KuMbudzi, travellers were waving down haulage trucks, lorries and pick-up trucks because their fares were "reasonably low".

"I spent four hours at Mbare (terminus) but there were no buses and besides they were charging very high fares, so I decided to come here and it looks like I won’t be here for long," said Mr Alois Mbamba who was travelling to Masvingo.

Yesterday, the Traffic Safety Council of Zimbabwe embarked on an awareness campaign at Mbare bus terminus to make drivers and passengers value safety during this festive season.

Acting regional traffic safety officer for the northern region Mr Jonah Mhangami said the campaign was meant to equip drivers with knowledge on how to avoid accidents.

At Colcom and Irvine’s there were long queues as people scrambled to buy chicken, pork products, beef and eggs.

People who spoke to The Herald said this year’s Christmas was different from those in recent years because this time shops were full and people had more disposable income.

"Christmas this year is totally different from the recent ones because there is price stability, shops are full and people have some disposable income. I just want to go and see my parents," said Mr Blessing Mandikonza who was travelling to Nyanga.

In the city, people were running around buying groceries, clothes, toys and other goodies but they bemoaned the delay by banks in dispensing cash.

"We are buying groceries this late because we could not access cash from the banks on time. However, we can at least afford a ‘Christmas basket’ and I am just anxious to go to my rural home and see my relatives after a long time," Mrs Pretty Njoba said.

School wear shops also enjoyed brisk business with parents buying school uniforms for their children saying they did not want to be affected by the "January disease"

"We are buying uniforms because we are afraid if we go for the holidays without buying uniforms and books for our children we won’t be able to do so in January.

"However, I have decided to spoil my family this holiday as I will be taking them to Victoria Falls because we can now afford to do that," said Mr Denford Chaora.

Filling stations in the city expressed confidence that they would be able to meet the fuel demand as they had enough reserves.

They said fuel prices were most likely to remain at an average of US$1,18 and US$0,98 per litre for petrol and diesel respectively.

As people were busy shopping, pickpockets have also taken advantage of the situation especially in the downtown area.

On Tuesday, deputy police spokesperson Chief Superintendent Oliver Mandipaka said they had deployed police countrywide to thwart criminal activities.

He said police were gathering intelligence through the police internal security intelligence and surveillance.

Chief Supt Mandipaka also urged people to secure their homes when travelling.


Nestlé saga: Deal reached

Herald Reporter

Nestlé Zimbabwe has been asked to reopen its factory after assurances were given by the Government over the safety of staff and agreement was reached over how milk from Gushungo Dairies will be processed.

In a statement yesterday, Industry and Commerce Minister Professor Welshman Ncube said he had held consultations with Nestlé Zimbabwe, Gushungo Dairies and other "key stakeholders in the dairy sector".

"As a result of those consultations, the parties have collectively reached an understanding to work together in ensuring that milk produced at Gushungo Dairies is absorbed by the local dairy processors.

"For its part, Government has given its assurance on the safety of staff and management at both Nestlé Zimbabwe and Gushungo Dairies," said the statement.

While no details of the "understanding" were made public, it appears that milk from Gushungo, which is owned by the First Family, will go into the general pool of milk processed by Dairibord and others and that Nestlé will buy its requirements from that pool.

Minister Ncube said he had been asked to intervene in the dispute by both President Mugabe and Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai after Nestlé’s Zurich head office said it was temporarily closing its Zimbabwe factory after two managers were questioned by police and the factory was forced to buy a tanker of milk from a "non-contracted" source.

On Wednesday during a Press conference by the three principals to the Global Political Agreement to review the operations of the inclusive Government since its formation early this year, PM Tsvangirai said: "Shutting down the plant is an overreaction that is totally unnecessary," he said.

Nestlé head office in Zurich had issued a statement saying that it was temporarily closing its Zimbabwe factory "since . . . normal operations and the safety of employees are no longer guaranteed".

The company said, in its statement through AFP, that on Saturday the factory was visited by Zimbabwean "officials" and police, and forced to accept a tanker of non-contracted milk. Two managers were questioned by police but were released without charge after questioning the same day.

The company said its Zimbabwe subsidiary stopped buying milk from non-contracted farmers in October when normal supplies resumed from Daribord.

It had started buying direct in February this year as a temporary measure to ensure food supplies when Dairibord could no longer pay farmers but had then returned to its normal system.

However, Nestlé had been under pressure from Western activists to stop buying milk from Gushungo Dairy Estates, a business owned by the First Family and which was supplying up to 15 percent of the factory’s milk, and from at least seven other new farmers.

The reason of switching back to Dairibord was not accepted by Zimbabwean pressure groups, who saw the move as an imposition of sanctions on the eight new farmers.


Govt makes strides in health provision

Herald Reporter

THE year comes to an end on a positive note after the health delivery system has begun showing signs of recovery.

Beginning the year at its lowest ebb that was punctuated by the menacing cholera epidemic, shortage of drugs and absenteeism by health professionals who could not afford to commute to and from work, the situation has started normalising.

Various programmes that have been instituted by inclusive Government have started to realise positive gains that need to be sustained in the following year.

The Health Ministry is one of the ministries that got a new leadership comprising Minister Henry Madzorera, Deputy Minister Douglas Mombeshora and Secretary Dr Gerald Gwinji but the transition did not affect operations in the sector.

The inclusive Government’s 100-day plan saw the introduction of the targeted approaches aimed at refurbishing all health institutions in the country.

Under the programme health institutions that had either closed or working far below capacity where targeted for revival.

The programme saw central hospitals ,such as the Harare Central Hospital, reopening their doors to the public.

Although the hospital is still to regain its status as one of the leading referral centres it has shown that, given adequate funds, it can retain its lost glory.

Harare Hospital has managed to reopen the children’s hospital and maternity section that had been closed due to shortage of essential drugs and accessories.

The hospital has also seen the refurbishment of the laundry equipment that had been defunct for the past three years.

The refurbishment exercises also helped in improving operations at Parirenyatwa Group of Hospitals, Mutare Hospital and United Bulawayo Hospital.

Owing to the positive improvements at the targeted institutions, Government has vowed to continue with the approach for the 2010 financial year. Health financing for the year 2009 was on the positive side as Government, for the first time honoured, its global obligation to allocate 15 percent of the national budget towards the health sector.

Government did not only honour the obligation but surpassed it by 0,7 percent —– a development hailed by health professionals.

This commitment by the Government is being carried forward into 2010 as evidenced by the 12,7 percent allocation towards the ministry.

Although the allocation is slightly below the United Nations 15 percent target, it is, however, double compared to the US$121 million that the ministry received in 2009.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Pakistani Taliban Commander Orders Thousands of Guerrillas to Afghanistan to Counter US Military Build-up

Wednesday, December 23, 2009
12:39 Mecca time, 09:39 GMT

Fighters 'sent to Afghan Taliban'

The Taliban's move come as the US orders more troops to Afghanistan

A senior Pakistani Taliban commander has said he has sent thousands of fighters into neighbouring Afghanistan to counter the rising level of US troops.

Waliur Rehman's comments, made to the Associated Press, came in a report released on Wednesday.

"Since [Barack] Obama [the US president] is also sending additional forces to Afghanistan, we sent thousands of our men there to fight Nato and American forces," Rehman said.

Rehman is a deputy to Hakimullah Mehsud, the leader of the Pakistani Taliban, and the man in charge of the group's operations in South Waziristan.

The Afghan Taliban told Al Jazeera said they had no need for the help of Pakistani fighters and do not recognise their leadership.

The Pakistani army has been conducting a campaign against the Taliban in that region for several months and the offensive is believed to have pushed many of Taliban fighters in the area to flee.

There are thought to be as many as 10,000 fighters in South Waziristan, including hundreds of Uzbek fighters.

'Confident performance'

The Pakistani military estimates it has killed about 600 Taliban fighters, but in his interview Rehman claimed to have lost fewer than 20 men.

Imran Khan, Al Jazeera's correspondent in Islamabad, said Rehman's interview was likely an attempt to play down the effects of the military's offensive in South Waziristan.

"They're saying here that the Taliban is putting a spin on it - it's a confident performance, but they've been forced into Afghanistan by the offensive [in South Waziristan]," he said.

"This is the Taliban saying we've not been forced by the Pakistani army, we're going across voluntarily."

The Associated Press interview with Rehman was conducted at a mud-brick compound in the Shaktoi area of South Waziristan on Monday.

The news agency also quoted Colonel Wayne Shanks, a US military spokesman in Afghanistan, as dismissing Rehman's comments as simply "rhetoric".

"We have not noticed any significant movement of insurgents in the border area," he said.

Army targeted

Imtiaz Gul, an expert on the Pakistani Taliban, said that Rehman's comment's needed to be taken "with a pinch of salt".

"If we look at the track record of the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan [the Pakistani Taliban, or TTP], they have been exclusively concentrating on targeting Pakistani army, Pakistani people and government installations," he told Al Jazeera.

"If Walid Rehman Mehsud has made this claim, this indicates perhaps a change in tactic or an attempt to divert attention from the TTP.

"Especially after the sweeping operation the army has conducted, they probably want to send a reassuring signal to their supporters that they are very much alive and kicking."

In his interview Rehman also said his group would stop attacking Pakistani forces if Pakistan would sever its ties to the US.

"We would again become Pakistan's brother if Pakistan ends its support for America," he was quoted as saying.

He urged the US president to focus on concerns at home, saying: "He should know that Americans don't want war ... He should use this money for the welfare of his own people."

Source: Al Jazeera and agencies

Obama and the Peace Prize: Contradictions, Strange Choices

FinalCall.com News

Obama and the Peace Prize: Contradictions, strange choices

By Brian E. Muhammad -Contributing Writer-
Updated Dec 21, 2009 - 9:45:08 AM

(FinalCall.com) - President Barack Obama accepted the Nobel Peace Prize Dec. 10 in Oslo, Sweden, where he delivered a speech expounding on the contrasts of war and peace.

The award was granted in October creating controversy about his qualifications for the prestigious honor. President Obama shares the distinction with past Laureates, Dr. Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela and Mother Theresa.

Reactions to the announcement and acceptance speech was both positive and negative, with questions on whether it's too soon for Mr. Obama to receive the prize because he's at the beginning of his presidency. Furthermore, critics question accepting the prize while engaging two wars with an escalation of 30,000 troops for Afghanistan.

Some observers say the choice was an affirmation of hope in America's new global posture of inclusiveness under Mr. Obama.

“They're trying to give some credibility to him because he's the first American president since Jimmy Carter to actually look at what's necessary to establish peace, where other American presidents wouldn't even talk,” said broadcaster and community leader Bob Law in a telephone interview.

“It's as Gil Scott Heron who said ‘when America, Britain and France talk about peace, they meant, a piece of Angola and a piece of Mozambique, their piece,' ” Mr. Law said.

In an October interview, journalist George Curry said the critical questions around Mr. Obama being chosen are valid. “Should a person conducting two wars be awarded a Nobel Peace Prize? That is a legitimate question,” opined Mr. Curry.

According to the nomination process, candidate names must be submitted by Feb. 1. Alfred Nobel, the award founder willed that the prize is given for accomplishments in the previous year.

“He had not been in office two weeks when the nomination was closed on this, so what did he accomplish in that time?” asked Mr. Curry.

“Congratulating and celebrating” the honor, Dr. Cornel West, Princeton University scholar and author, underscored the dilemma of being a war president with a peace prize.

“It's difficult for any head of empire to be under the pressure of peace because you are head of the largest army in the world,” said Dr. West, speaking in Los Angeles, in remarks posted on line by www.Fora.TV.

In Oslo, President Obama's central theme was on “just war,” suggesting armed conflict is justified under certain conditions like “last resort” or “self-defense.” The speech dubbed the “Obama doctrine” resonated with Mr. Obama's most avid foes on the political right like former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich who praised the speech.

Some eyebrows were raised when Obama described his acceptance of the prize—as compared to non-violence advocates Dr. King and Mahatma Gandhi—as “a head of state sworn to protect and defend my nation, I cannot be guided by their examples alone. I face the world as it is, and cannot stand idle in the face of threats to the American people.”

Zaki Baruti, of the Universal African Peoples Organization, disagreed with President Obama's comparison. “One of the substantive things Gandhi and Dr. King were trying to effect was great social change by justice and equality, where as Obama is simply fulfilling ambitions of empire,” Mr. Baruti said.

Notwithstanding Mr. Obama's effort to justify accepting the peace prize eight days after announcing a troop escalation in Afghanistan, historically the move is not a unique contradiction to the award.

In 1973, then U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger was granted the prize. But inquiries have since arisen about Mr. Kissinger as a possible war “criminal at large” for his role in the bombing of North Vietnam, Cambodia and covert support for the overthrow and assassination of Chile's President Salvador Allende in 1973.

The 1978 recipient was Menechem Begin, a Zionist terrorist and former Prime Minister of Israel, jointly shared with Egyptian President Anwar Sadat. Peace still eludes occupied Palestine.

In 1993, the prize went to President Nelson Mandela for his struggle and sacrifice to overcome racist White minority in South Africa. But the veracity of the choice was compromised in the eyes of many when it was shared with F.W. de Klerk, who served in the apartheid regime as a cabinet member and head of the state.

Such incongruity has existed since the beginning of the prize with the 1906 laureate, President Theodore Roosevelt. Mr. Roosevelt was chosen for mediating the end of the Russia-Japan war, although he has proven to be one of history's most ardent warmongers.

The most overlooked contradiction of the prize may be the deadly contributions of founder Alfred Nobel, who became wealthy as an inventor and manufacturer of the high explosives nitroglycerin and dynamite. He was one of the largest manufacturers of war making materials of his time.

In a historical context, the Obama selection is only the latest in a long line of contradictions and strange choices.

FCN is a distributor (and not a publisher) of content supplied by third parties. Original content supplied by FCN and FinalCall.com News is Copyright 2009 FCN Publishing, FinalCall.com. Content supplied by third parties are the property of their respective owners.

Why I Want to March in Gaza, By Pam Rasmussen

Why I want to march in Gaza

Pam Rasmussen, The Electronic Intifada, 23 December 2009

Peace and justice activists will soon travel to Gaza to show their support for Palestinians under siege

On 29 December, I will attempt to cross into the Gaza Strip along with 1,300 other peace and justice activists from 43 countries. Some of us have traveled to Gaza previously. It will be my third visit since the Israeli invasion, which destroyed or damaged more than 50,000 homes and 90 percent of private industry.

But this time is different. The date of our arrival marks one year since the attack, and little has changed. Due to the ongoing blockade imposed by Israel and Egypt, with the acquiescence of the United States and the European Union, few homes have been rebuilt, unemployment is nearing 50 percent, children at two-thirds of the schools are studying without notebooks and pencils, and babies are suffering from nitrate poisoning due to contaminated water. Enough is enough. It's time to do something dramatic: It's time for the Gaza Freedom March.

The idea for the march grew out of a CODEPINK: Women for Peace delegation to Gaza in June. Norman Finkelstein -- the Jewish scholar and critic of Zionist racism -- envisioned a global convergence of justice activists, arriving the week of the one-year mark to protest the ongoing siege. That "convergence" will soon become a reality -- if, that is, Egypt doesn't stand in the way by refusing to open the Rafah crossing as it is threatening to do. The 1,300 internationals will be joined by an estimated 50,000 Palestinians in Gaza, when we march on 31 December from Abed Rabbo (a community in which nearly every building was destroyed during the invasion) to the Erez crossing into Israel. Likewise, on the other side of the crossing in Israel, peace activists will stage their own, companion march.

But why march in Gaza? As so many people have asked me, why not help the millions of needy people here at home, instead of a people thousands of miles away who seem destined to be embroiled in a never-ending conflict? There is indeed a multitude of worthy causes -- both domestic and international. In 2007, the UN's Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT), John Dugard, issued a harshly critical report on Israel's human rights record. He addressed this question by explaining: "[T]here is no other case of a Western-affiliated regime that denies self-determination and human rights to a developing people and that has done so for so long. This explains why the OPT has become a test for the West, a test by which its commitment to human rights is to be judged." The "facts on the ground" in Palestine have only worsened in the three years since then, culminating with Israel's disproportionate attack on Gaza.

In addition, Americans like me are partly responsible for the suffering of so many innocent people, since our government gives Israel $7 million per day in mostly military aid, with virtually no strings attached -- far more than to all the countries of sub-Saharan Africa combined. Americans are therefore considered by much of the world as responsible for Israeli violations of human rights. In addition, the US has blocked any UN Security Council censure of Israel 42 times.

But perhaps the most important reason I am going back to Gaza and on the Gaza Freedom March is that ever since I first set foot on Palestine's blood- and tear-soaked land in 2007, I have felt embraced heart and soul by the people. The type of society I want to live in knows no borders between the privileged and everyone else. But if lines must be drawn -- or, in this case, walls and barbed-wire fences built -- then I will stand with the Palestinians.

Pam Rasmussen is a peace activist and communications professional from Maryland who recently received a Community Human Rights Award for her work on behalf of Palestinians from the UN Association of the National Capitol Area. She can be contacted at peacenut57@yahoo.comcom.

US-backed Egyptian Government to Block Gaza March in Solidarity With Palestine

Gaza Freedom March URGENT UPDATE

December 21, 2009

We are determined to break the siege

We all will continue to do whatever we can to make it happen

Using the pretext of escalating tensions on the Gaza-Egypt border, the Egyptian Foreign Ministry informed us yesterday that the Rafah border will be closed over the coming weeks, into January. We responded that there is always tension at the border because of the siege, that we do not feel threatened, and that if there are any risks, they are risks we are willing to take. We also said that it was too late for over 1,300 delegates coming from over 42 countries to change their plans now. We both agreed to continue our exchanges.

Although we consider this as a setback, it is something we ' ve encountered-and overcome--before. No delegation, large or small, that entered Gaza over the past 12 months has ever received a final OK before arriving at the Rafah border. Most delegations were discouraged from even heading out of Cairo to Rafah. Some had their buses stopped on the way. Some have been told outright that they could not go into Gaza . But after public and political pressure, the Egyptian government changed its position and let them pass.

Our efforts and plans will not be altered at this point. We have set out to break the siege of Gaza and march on December 31 against the Israeli blockade. We are continuing in the same direction.

Egyptian embassies and missions all over the world must hear from our supporters (by phone, fax and email)** over the coming crucial days, with a clear message: Let the international delegation enter Gaza and let the Gaza Freedom March proceed.

Contact your local consulate here:
http://www.mfa.gov.eg/MFA_Portal/en-GB/mfa_websits/

Contact the Palestine Division in Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Cairo

Ahmed Azzam, tel +202-25749682 Email: ahmed.azzam@mfa.gov.eg

If you are in the U.S. , contact the Egyptian Embassy, 202-895-5400 and ask for Omar Youssef or email omaryoussef@hotmail.com

You signed on to support the the Gaza Freedom March, that was the first step. Now call the Egyptian embassy and ask your elected official to call on your behalf. Then, hit the streets and join a solidarity action in your community: www.gazafreedommarch.org/solidarity

Thank you for being part of a global movement.

The Gaza Freedomo March Steering Committee

* * Sample text

I am writing/calling to express my full support for the December 31, 2009 Gaza Freedom March. I urge the Egyptian government to allow the 1,300 international delegates to enter the Gaza Strip through Egypt .

The aim of the march is to call on Israel to lift the siege. The delegates will also take in badly needed medical aid, as well as school supplies and winter jackets for the children of Gaza .

Please, let this historic March proceed.

Thank you.

Israel Admits to Organ Thefts From Palestinians

Monday, December 21, 2009
12:40 Mecca time, 09:40 GMT

Israel admits to organ thefts

Harvested organs were alleged to have been used by the military and in public hospitals

Israel has admitted that it harvested organs from the dead bodies of Palestinians and Israelis in the 1990s, without permission from their families.

The admission follows the release of an interview with Jehuda Hiss, the former head of Israel's forensic institute, in which he said that workers at the institute had harvested skin, corneas, heart valves and bones from Israelis, Palestinians and foreign workers.

In the interview, which was conducted in 2000 when Hiss was head of Tel Aviv's Abu Kabir forensic institute, he said: "We started to harvest corneas ... Whatever was done was highly informal. No permission was asked from the family."

Nancy Scheper-Hughes, who conducted the interview, told Al Jazeera on Monday that Hiss had said the "body parts were used by hospitals for transplant purposes - cornea transplants. They were sent to public hospitals [for use on citizens].

Guidelines 'not clear'

"And the skin went to a special skin bank, founded by the military, for their uses", such as for burns victims.

The practice is said to have ended in 2000.

The interview was also reported on Israel's Channel 2 television, which quoted an Israeli military statement that said: "This activity ended a decade ago and does not happen any longer."

Israel's health ministry said in the Channel 2 report that at the time the guidelines for transplants "were not clear" and that for the last 10 years "Abu Kabir has been working according to ethics and Jewish law".

Scheper-Hughes, who is a professor of anthropology at the University of California-Berkeley, said that she made the interview public because of the controversy last summer over allegations of organ harvesting made by a Swedish newspaper.

In August the Aftonbladet newspaper ran an article alleging that the Israeli army had stolen body organs from Palestinian men after killing them.

Israel denied the claims, calling them anti-Semitic, and the incident raised tensions when Sweden refused to apologise for the article, saying that press freedom prevented it from intervening.

'Conflict deaths'

Donald Bostrom, the journalist who broke the story in Aftonbladet, told Al Jazeera: "UN staff came to me and said that you have to look into this very serious issue. Palestinian young people were disappearing in the areas and five days later they appear back in the villages with an autopsy done on them against the will of the families.

"We need to know who are the victims. Mothers need to know what happened to their sons."

Bostrom said that there is no proof that people were killed for their organs but that an investigation is needed to find out whether there was a policy in place or if the bodies used were random.

Bostrom added that Hiss is the "main key" to solving such unanswered questions, but that there would also be other people involved who could help uncover the truth.

Scheper-Hughes said that some of the dead Palestinians from whom organs were harvested were killed during military raids.

"Some of the bodies were definitely Palestinians who were killed in conflicts," she told Al Jazeera.

"Their organs were taken without consent of families and were used to serve the needs of the country in terms of hospitals as well as the army's needs."

'Technically illegal'

She said that Hiss told her "that the people who did the harvesting were sent by the military. They were often medical students".

"He did it informally and without permission, and it was technically illegal," she said.

The military establishment gave their "sanction and approval" to the procedures, according to Scheper-Hughes.

During his interview with Scheper-Hughes, Hiss said that the eyelids of bodies were glued shut to prevent the removal of corneas being found out.

Hiss was dismissed as head of Abu Kabir in 2004 over irregularities in the use of organs, but charges against him were eventually dropped. He still holds the position of chief pathologist at the institute.

Source: Al Jazeera and agencies

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

US Recovery on Shaky Ground

Wednesday, December 23, 2009
04:09 Mecca time, 01:09 GMT

US recovery on shaky ground

Despite the coming holiday season, shops are still struggling to pull in customers

The US economy is growing, but not as much as expected new figures have shown.

Data released on Tuesday showed the US GDP grew 2.2 per cent from July through September, more than half a percentage point down from earlier forecasts.

The revised growth figure follows four successive quarters of decline in the world's largest economy, but prospects for a sustainable recovery remain uncertain.

The expansion was largely driven by massive government spending, including the so-called "cash-for-clunkers" programme to encourage spending on new cars.

Meanwhile, business investment remains well down, as are bank lending figures, and despite the Christmas holiday season, consumer spending has been tepid at best.

At the same time, unemployment stands at around 10 per cent, with warnings that that figure could rise yet further before it starts to improve.

Fear

Speaking to Al Jazeera, New York-based economist Max Fraad Wolff said while the US economy was officially out of recession, most Americans still felt very uneasy.

"The feeling in the gut and hearts and minds of most Americans is still one of fear and a lot of less than convinced sentiment about the future of the economy for them," he said.

Scott Brown, chief economist at Raymond James & Associates, said the report was "a bit disappointing" and suggested "that underlying domestic demand is pretty soft."

Brown said he expected a jump in growth to at least 4.0 per cent in the current fourth quarter, but added that much of that will come from restocking of business inventories drawn down in the recession.

Looking forward to the coming year, Brown said the economy may grow at around 3.0 per cent "which is good by historical standard but not enough to bring the unemployment rate down substantially."

"It's going to take a long time before we're firing on all cylinders," he added.

UK slump deepens

Tuesday's revised US growth figures came as figures from across the Atlantic painted an even bleaker picture, with figures showing the UK economy still stuck in recession.

According to government data GDP shrank by 0.2 per cent in the third quarter, casting further doubt over the country's recovery.

Britain is now the last major economy still in recession, having now contracted for six quarters in a row.

The slump is Britain's longest and deepest recession since the end of the World War Two.

Source: Al Jazeera and agencies

Egypt Bans Gaza Border Protest

Egypt bans Gaza border protest

Egypt has rejected a request to allow activists to march across the
border into the Gaza Strip to mark the anniversary of last year's
conflict.

The Egyptian foreign ministry said the march could not be allowed
because of the "sensitive situation" in Gaza.

Over 1,000 activists from 42 countries had signed-up to join "the Gaza freedom march" planned for next week.

Egypt warned that anyone attempting the crossing from Egypt would be "dealt with by the law".

Palestinians and human rights groups say more than 1,400 Gazans were killed in the violence between 27 December and 16 January, though Israel puts the figure at 1,166. Three Israeli civilians and 10
Israeli soldiers were also killed.

The UN's Goldstone report has said both the Israeli army and
Palestinian militants committed war crimes and possible crimes against humanity during fighting.

Egypt has begun constructing a huge metal wall along its border with
the Gaza Strip as it attempts to cut smuggling tunnels.

When it is finished the wall will be 10-11km (6-7 miles) long and will
extend 18 metres below the surface.

Gaza is under a tight Israeli and Egyptian blockade, tightened since
Hamas took over the strip in 2007.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/8425232.stm
Published: 2009/12/21 16:47:48 GMT

Cuba News Update: President Raul Castro Speaks to the Closing Session of the National People's Assembly

I congratulate our heroic and revolutionary people and wish them renewed success in the 52nd year of the Revolution

Susana Lee and Juan Diego Nusa

WITH this message, President Raúl Castro ended his closing speech at the final session of the National Assembly of People’s Power.

Under the direction of Ricardo Alarcón de Quesada, president of the highest body of state power, the 4th ordinary session of the 7th Legislature began its work with a moving tribute to Commander of the Revolution Juan Almeida Bosque.

During the meeting on Sunday, December 20, the Assembly jointly approved economic and social policy lines and the 2010 state budget. The latter was presented by parliamentary deputy Marino Murillo Jorge, vice president of the Council of Ministers and minister of economy and planning, who reported that despite the country’s complex economic situation, economic growth for 2009 is estimated at 1.4%, and for 2010, the proposed figure is 1.9%.

Deputy Osvaldo Martinez, president of the Economic Affairs Commission, spoke on both documents, and later began the discussions in which several parliamentarians participated.

Also during the session meetings, the seven vacancies on the Council of State were filled: as vice presidents, Commander of the Revolution Ramiro Valdés Menéndez and Gladys Bejerano Portela, the first woman to hold such a high responsibility; and as members, Liudmila Alamo Dueñas, Isis Angelina Diez Duardo, Kirenia Díaz Burke, Marino Murillo Jorge and Sergio Rodríguez Morales.

The Assembly recognized Julio Martínez for having resigning from the Council State so that his seat could be filled by Liudmila Alamo, currently first secretary of the UJC (Union of Young Communists).

Likewise, Jorge Luis Sierra, vice president of the Council of Ministers and minister of transport, presented the proposed Traffic and Transit Code. He emphasized that, in compliance with Decree-law No. 231 of 2002, for the last seven years, a group of experts from the Ministries of the Interior, Transport, Labor and Social Security, Public Health, and Education and Construction have worked on a thorough revision of Law No. 60, the highway administration and transit code.

In presenting the report on the proposed law, Deputy José Luis Toledo Santander, president of the Constitutional and Legal Affairs Commission, said that the recommendation was to continue the nationwide study and analysis of the proposed law, and to postpone the vote on it until the next ordinary session of the Legislature, given the complexity of the issues addressed and the need for a broad knowledge of the law’s contents.

The National Assembly passed proposals to back the position of Cuba and the other member countries of the ALBA bloc (Bolivarian Alternative for the Peoples of Our America) at the recently-concluded summit on climate change in Copenhagen, and to intensify the work underway to demand the liberation of the five Cuban national heroes.

It was also agreed that the year 2010 will be called "Year 52 of the Revolution," in line with the decision taken at the 8th ordinary session of the previous Legislature.

At the beginning of the meeting, Alarcón announced the presence of Evariste Boshab, president of the National Assembly of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and also announced that María Esther Reus González, minister of justice, had occupied her post as parliamentary deputy for the municipality of Sancti Spíritus.

Translated by Granma International


Havana December 22, 2009

Cuban foreign minister: Copenhagen was a failure and a step backwards

Juan Diego Nusa Peñalver

THE recently-concluded 15th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Copenhagen, Denmark, was a failure, and it signified a step backwards in the international community’s actions to prevent or mitigate the effects of global warming, Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla said at a Monday press conference at the Cuban Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

After rejecting the accusations of British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Environmental Minister Ed Miliband that a handful of countries (referring to Third World nations) took the conference hostage, Rodríguez Parrilla explained that the conference, which generated so many expectations, made no decisions whatsoever on any binding or nonbinding commitments, either political or related to international law.

Unfortunately, there was no agreement in Copenhagen, he emphasized.

Rodríguez Parrilla affirmed that there was only ambiguous, deceitful wheeling-and-dealing behind the back of the Conference imposed by President Barack Obama on a group of countries, and subsequent attempts to impose these on states party to the convention.

In that context, he said that the cause of the failure lies in the lack of political will on the part of the industrialized countries, which drafted a final document and tried to utilize it to distribute responsibilities and financial commitments to developing nations, even the poorest on the planet, including islands that may disappear as a result of the climate change phenomenon.

The West refused to accept binding commitments to reduce its carbon dioxide emissions by 40% by the year 2020, or to transfer technology and the accompanying financial aid to poor countries to help them reduce their harmful toxic emissions, the Cuban foreign minister stated.

In exposing the role of the U.S. president at the conference, he said, "at this Summit, there has been only one imperial, arrogant Obama, who does not listen, who imposes positions on and even threatens developing countries."

Translated by Granma International

Refusal to Release Imam Luqman Ameen Abdullah's Autopsy Raises Suspicions in Detroit

December 22, 2009
http://detnews.com/article/20091222/METRO01/912220352

Refusal to release imam's autopsy raises suspicions

County medical examiner cites investigation as the reason for holding on to information

PAUL EGAN
The Detroit News

Dearborn -- The Wayne County medical examiner's refusal to release its autopsy report on Imam Luqman Ameen Abdullah is fueling concerns in the Muslim community about a possible cover-up of facts surrounding his death, a community leader said Monday.

Abdullah, 53, was killed Oct. 28 in a gunfight with the FBI at a
Dearborn warehouse. The FBI said Abdullah, an alleged leader of a
radical Muslim separatist group involved in fencing stolen goods,
fired a weapon that killed an FBI dog.

The county Medical Examiner's Office denied a Nov. 2 request The
Detroit News filed for Abdullah's medical examiner report, saying it
was not complete.

Dawud Walid, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic
Relations of Michigan, said the county office has not responded to a
request from his organization requesting a copy of the report once it
is completed. The office also quoted exorbitant fees for copies of
autopsy photos, he said.

Dennis Niemiec, a spokesman for the county, confirmed Monday that the report is completed but is being withheld at the request of Dearborn Police Chief Ronald Haddad, who does not want the report released until his department completes its investigation. The county will seek more information from Haddad about how the release of the report would hamper his investigation, Niemiec said.

Haddad could not be reached for comment.

Walid said medical examiner reports are frequently released during
active police investigations.

"The unfortunate and perhaps unintended consequence is that the
failure to release the autopsy report and the very exorbitant amount
for the pictures is raising in the minds of some people in the
community that there's a potential cover-up," Walid said.

How many times he was shot, whether he suffered dog bites, and whether Abdullah was handcuffed after he was shot are among the questions on people's minds, Walid said.

Special Agent Sandra Berchtold, a spokeswoman for the FBI, said it was not the federal agency's call to withhold the report. However,
"evidence is often not released during an ongoing investigation," she
said.

U-M Researchers Say Politics Guided Bank Bailout Allocations

Posted: Dec. 22, 2009

U-M researchers say politics guided bank bailout allocations

BY KATHERINE YUNG
FREE PRESS BUSINESS WRITER

Researchers from the University of Michigan have confirmed what many have long suspected: Politics played a key role in deciding which banks received billions in government bailout money and how much each one got.

According to a new study released Monday by Ran Duchin and Denis
Sosyura at the university's Ross School of Business, banks with strong political connections were more likely to benefit from the
government's $250-billion Capital Purchase Program, part of its
Troubled Asset Relief Program or TARP.

The study found that banks fared better if they had executives holding
board seats at any of the 12 Federal Reserve banks or if their
headquarters was located in the district of a U.S. House of
Representatives member serving on key finance committees. And the amount of government investment was "strongly related to banks'
political contributions and lobbying expenditures."

The findings are likely to intensify criticism of the bank bailout
program, which has already come under attack for aiding the biggest
banks while leaving many small and struggling ones without any help.

"Our results show that political connections play an important role in
a firm's access to capital," Sosyura, an assistant professor of
finance, said in a statement.

Contact KATHERINE YUNG: 313-222-8763 or kyung@freepress.com

What’s At Stake in Guinea-Conakry?: Political Turmoil Draws Response From the West

What’s At Stake in Guinea-Conakry?: Political Turmoil Draws Response From the West

One year after military coup the mineral-rich state faces greater instability

By Abayomi Azikiwe
Editor, Pan-African News Wire
Commentary

In late 2008, in the aftermath of the death of longtime military leader Lansana Conte, lower-ranking officers in the Guinean military seized power claiming they were motivated by patriotism and the need to fight corruption. Capt. Moussa Dadis Camara was the leader of the coup and the new ruling junta declared that it did not wish to maintain power but would soon create the conditions for democratic elections involving all political parties inside the country.

Nonetheless, several months after the seizure of power by Camara, he would announce his desire to stand for president of the country. After Camara proclaimed his interest in becoming the political leader of Guinea, a storm of criticism came forward from popular organizations, political parties and the trade unions.

On September 28, at a rally organized by the trade unions in the capital of Conakry, soldiers opened fire on the crowd resulting in the deaths of 156 people and the injuring and assaulting of hundreds of others. The massacre prompted condemnations inside Guinea as well as throughout the region and the international community.

Since the September 28 mass killings and assaults by the military, the regional Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) has implemented sanctions against Guinea. These sanctions have been bolstered by similar measures enacted by the United States, the European Union and the African Union.

As the domestic and worldwide criticism of the Camara regime escalated, tensions grew within the ruling junta. On December 3, Camara was shot in the neck by his chief-of-staff Lt. Toumba Diakite, in an apparent assassination attempt. Camara was flown out of the country to Morocco the following day where he remains in a hospital undergoing treatment for serious medical conditions resulting from the gunshot wound.

Lt. Diakite said that he shot Camara because the coup leader had sought to apportion blame on him for the September 28 killings. Diakite said he felt betrayed and sought to eliminate Camara.

At present the military regime is headed by the former Vice-President and Defense Minister Gen. Sekouba Konate.

Diakite remains at large at the time of this writing, however, he is not the only person of interests in the attempted assassination of Camara. A few days after Camara was wounded, the French ambassador to Guinea was stopped in his vehicle and searched by soldiers. The communications minister of Guinea refused to comment on the diplomatic incident but accused the French secret service of “being complicit in the assassination attempt.” (Associated Press, December 8)

In response to the incident, the French Foreign Ministry spokesman Bernard Valero stated that the claims of his government’s involvement in the wounding of Camara were “absurd rumors that I forcefully deny.” (AP, December 8) In regard to the search of the French ambassador’s vehicle, it has been reported that he was being driven to the airport with his wife when stopped. The diplomat’s bodyguards were reportedly forced to get out of the vehicle and lie down on the pavement while Guinean soldiers pointed rocket launchers at them.

France had called for foreign intervention in Guinea in the aftermath of the massacre on September 28. Camara had dismissed the French calls for international involvement and described French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner’s call for outside intervention an affront to the dignity of African people. France is the former colonial power in Guinea and still has substantial financial interests in the country.

Guinea’s minerals resources and the struggle for genuine independence

The post-colonial history of Guinea differs from other former French-controlled territories in West Africa. In 1958, under the leadership of the Democratic Party of Guinea (PDG) headed by Ahmed Sekou Toure, the country opted out of the colonial orbit of influence and struck out to build a genuinely independent state under socialism.

Sekou Toure began his political career within the labor movement when he was one of the co-founders and general secretary of the Postal Workers’ Union (PTT) in 1945. Toure had been involved in protest activity as a student under the French colonial system and as a result was expelled from school. He continued to study and was heavily influenced by the writings of Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin.

In 1952, Toure took over leadership of the Democratic Party of Guinea, which represented a section of the region-wide Rassemblement Democratique Africain (RDA), a political party agitating for the liberation of colonial territories in West Africa. By 1956, Toure had established the General des Travailleurs d’Afrique Noire, a regional trade union federation in the French-controlled colonies in West Africa.

However, in 1958 Guinea alone set the tone for the more militant character of the African independence movements. After rejecting the proposed neo-colonial model advocated by DeGaulle, France broke political and economic ties when the PDG successfully organized a No vote against remaining within the colonial system and declared national independence on October 2, 1958.

Guinea is known for its vast mineral wealth which encompasses the largest reserves of known bauxite deposits in the world. Other natural resources found in Guinea includes iron ores, gold, diamonds, limestone, uranium, copper, silver, talc, manganese, beryllium, platinum, nickel graphite and kaolin. There has been oil exploration going on for nearly three decades in the shelf region.

Nonetheless, these resources have not brought prosperity to the country. Under the PDG, the country fought for years to break out of the isolation in the region which stemmed from the No vote of 1958. Other states in the region such as Senegal under Leopold Senghor and Ivory Coast under Felix Houphouet-Boigny remained within the French colonial sphere of influence. Only Mali under Modibo Keita formed an alliance with Guinea along with Ghana, a former British colony. In 1960 these three states in West Africa formed the Ghana-Guinea-Mali Union as a united front against neo-colonialism and imperialism in the region.

Kwame Nkrumah, the founder of the Convention People’s Party of Ghana, was overthrown in a right-wing military coup that was backed by the United States in February 1966. Nkrumah had provided a lifeline to Guinea in 1958 when it provided a loan of 10 million pound sterling to assist its efforts to consolidate power after the French withdrawal.

When Nkrumah was overthrown in 1966 he re-located in Guinea and was appointed as co-president along with Sekou Toure. In 1968, Modibo Keita was overthrown in Mali and imprisoned which furthered the isolation of Guinea within the region.

Guinea had allied itself with the Soviet Union and other socialist countries during the early days of independence. In 1961 he was awarded the prestigious Lenin Peace Prize in Moscow. Guinea became a proud example for African revolutionaries and pan-africanists throughout the continent and the world.

During the 1960s and early 1970s Guinea served as a rear base for the African Party for the Independence of Guinea and Cape Verde (PAIGC) which was headed by Amilcar Cabral, an agronomist who was a major theoretical contributor to the anti-colonial struggle. Cabral led the armed struggle against Portuguese colonialism in Guinea-Bissau and was assassinated in Conakry in early 1973.

Guinea in the late 1970s sought to normalize relations with both France and the United States when President Toure visited both Paris and Washington. However, the PDG was overthrown in a right-wing military coup in April 1984 in the immediate aftermath of the death of Toure. The coup was led by Lansana Conte, a captain within the army. Conte ruled Guinea until his death in December 2008 sparking the most recent coup by Capt. Moussa Dadis Camara.

The Role of the trade unions in the present crisis

When plans were announced to further institutionalize the rule of Camara, it was the trade union movement in Guinea which took the initiative to oppose the military. Since the massacre on September 28, the trade unions have organized a one-day general strike in protests against the killings.

On December 2, workers in Guinea threatened to strike again if the ruling military regime did not pay damages to the families of the deceased killed on September 28. The demands advanced by the trade unions also included a doubling in the wages of civil servants and the release of political prisoners.

In a document issued by the trade union federations in early December, it stated that “Failure to meet these demands obliges the central trade unions of Guinea to use all legal means to attain the legitimate aspirations of the workers.” (Reuters, December 2)

According to a Reuters press report on December 2 “A general strike in Guinea could affect bauxite exports from the world’s biggest supplier and raise tension in a nation bordering Sierra Leone, Ivory Coast and Liberia—three countries still recovering from civil war.”

Industrial actions by the trade union movement in Guinea during 2007 crippled the economy and the government. The strike forced the previous regime of Lansana Conte to institute reforms that resulted in the appointment of a Prime Minister Lansana Kouyate. Nonetheless, Kouyate was incapable of improving the social conditions of the workers and consequently lost popularity among the Guinean masses.

In the current crisis in Guinea, the trade unions are the only organized force inside the country that can form an alliance that could possibly force the resignation of the military regime and create the political conditions for the establishment of a progressive government that would put the country back on track towards genuine independence.

Recent reports issued by Human Rights Watch and the United Nations calling for Camara and Diakite to be tried for crimes against humanity should be viewed within the context of the important role of Guinea in supplying mineral resources to the western capitalist countries. The United Nations and other western-based institutions have in the past largely focused on crimes committed in Africa and ignored the human rights violations carried out by the United States, Britain and other imperialist states.

On December 14 ECOWAS announced that it was considering the deployment of an “intervention force” in Guinea. An ECOWAS official told the BBC that the unrest inside Guinea was a threat to the stability of the entire region. (BBC, December 14)

In response a spokesman for the military regime, Col. Moussa Keita, described the possible plans for an ECOWAS military intervention as unacceptable. Keita said that “The sending of any foreign force on to Guinean soil without the government’s prior authorization will be considered as an assault on the authority of the state and on the integrity of the nation.” (BBC, December 14)

ECOWAS president Mohammed Ibn Chambas described the prospective military intervention as a “preventive deployment of a humanitarian and civilian protection force.” However, if an ECOWAS military force was deployed to Guinea it would in all likelihood be financed and coordinated by France and the United States. Such an intervention force would not intervene on behalf of the Guinean masses to improve working conditions and end political repression.

Is This a Recovery?: Hidden Unemployment and the Crisis in Education Funding

Is This a Recovery?: Hidden Unemployment and the Crisis in Education Funding

A real program is needed to create employment and reverse budget cuts

by Abayomi Azikiwe
Editor, Pan-African News Wire

A recent article in the Detroit News confirms what most working people in Detroit have been saying for some time and that is the official employment figures issued by the federal government do not give an accurate description of the depth of the economic crisis inside the city. According to the article, the actual rate of unemployment in Detroit is closer to 50 percent rather than the nearly 28 percent that has been reported over the last several months. (Detroit News, December 16)

Detroit has been seriously affected by the economic crisis because of the large numbers of people who were employed in the automotive and steel industries. General Motors Corporation, which was one of the largest employers in the Detroit metropolitan area, has trimmed hundreds of thousands of jobs over the last two decades. The other two auto firms, Chrysler and Ford, have also eliminated tens of thousands of jobs just in the last few years.

The massive elimination of jobs in the automotive and steel industries has had a tremendous impact on other sectors of the economy including retail, health care, entertainment, culture, housing, education and public service. This ripple effect is clearly demonstrated in Detroit and the state of Michigan during the present period where jobs cuts have been carried out on a broad level.

According to a University of Michigan Professor George Fulton, who analyzes employment data for the state of Michigan, a broader definition of joblessness is needed in order to get a more objective view of the economic situation in the state. In the official calculations of employment data, those who are working part-time, who have become discouraged and are no longer actively seeking jobs, and people that are returning to school because of the economic situation, are not factored into the overall rate of unemployment.

The Detroit News article reports that “The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimated that for the year that ended in September, Michigan’s official unemployment rate was 12.6 percent. Using the broadest definition of unemployment, the state unemployment rate was 20.9 percent, or 66 percent higher than the official rate. Since Detroit’s official rate for October was 27 percent, that broader rate pushes the city’s rate to as high as 44.8 percent.

Impact on Education

In the field of education, Detroit has witnessed a reduction in enrollment of approximately 100,000 students over the last decade. Many of these youth have left the city with their families who are in pursuit of employment. With the loss of students, it is inevitable that schools will be closed down and teachers, clerical workers, custodians, social workers and counselors will lose their jobs.

Another major contributing factor to the decline in enrollment in the public school system is the “charterization” of public education in Detroit and the surrounding communities. Over the last decade the notion that charter and private schools are inherently superior to public institutions has been advanced through the corporate media, private corporations and segments of the political class from both the Republican and Democratic parties.

Although there is no scientific empirical evidence proving that charter schools provide better curriculums and get greater results than their public counterparts, in fact some studies suggest just the opposite, the movement towards privatization of education is well underway. Even the Obama administration is firmly on record in support of charter schools as well as merit pay for teachers.

Both the expansion of charter schools and the policy of merit pay for teachers undermine the unions which are often characterized by the corporate media as bad for student achievement. The onus of good or bad academic performance in the public schools is often blamed on teachers and parents. Yet the drastic cutbacks in public education funding by the states is very rarely taken into consideration by the corporate media when they address the problems in school performance.

A new initiative of the Obama administration is "Race to the Top."--a national education policy which encourages the “charterization” of public schools. In the state of Michigan, the legislative body in the capital of Lansing passed a major education reform bill which was a prerequisite to receiving $400 million in federal funding under the Obama administration.

The highlights of the recently passed legislation that was rushed through to meet a deadline prior to the end of 2009, includes the expansion of what is called "high quality charter schools." The legislation also gives the state the green light to take over up to 5 percent of schools that are labeled as performing poorly. In addition, the new so-called reform legislation allows some professionals to gain certification in teaching without training in education and to permit school districts to give merit pay to teachers utilizing federally mandated standards of school performance. (Sunday Free Press, December 20)

Unions representing school educators have opposed this new legislation saying that it undermines their collective bargaining rights and capacity to win decent contracts for teachers. “This strips employees of their voice in helping students in these struggling schools,” said Doug Pratt, the spokesperson for the Michigan Education Association (MEA). “It is completely inappropriate.” (Sunday Free Press, December 20)

At the same time that this federal money is being offered to the state, in Michigan education funding was slashed $350 million for the 2009-10 fiscal year. These cuts have not only impacted Detroit with its over 80 percent African-American population, it is also affecting the suburban communities who are also being forced to lay off teachers, cut pay, close schools, eliminate academic and sports programs in order address the loss of funding.

For example, school districts outside Detroit including Dearborn, Highland Park, Livonia, Bloomfield Township, Southfield and Lathrup Village have been forced to make recommendations that will close buildings, lay off educators and eliminate transportation for students. In these communities thousands of parents have rallied at school board meetings to demand that the cuts be halted. However, school administrators and board members say they have no choice but to make these cuts in light of the drastic reductions in state funding.

In a recent article published in The Sunday Oakland Press, the cutbacks taking place in Southfield and Lathrup Village were highlighted. Both of these districts have also experienced declining enrollment in the public schools.

The Oakland Press article written by Connie Cuellar says that “The Southfield Public Schools 2009 Citizens Task Force on Declining Enrollment recommended a financial action plan to the school board this month that calls for closing schools, including Southfield-Lathrup High School.” (Oakland Press, December 20)

Lathrup Village Mayor Frank Brock said that “The task force exhaustively reviewed enrollment, trends and projections, current finances, financial forecasts, district programs and instructional services while developing the recommendations.” Brock, along with Southfield Councilman Myron Frasier, co-chaired the task force and recommended that the district close Eisenhower Elementary, Leonhard Elementary, Thompson Middle School in addition to Southfield-Lathrup High School. Students from these schools would be transferred to other buildings in the district.

The Southfield-Lathrup school board will take the recommendations of the task force as a first step in arresting the mounting budget deficit reaching into the millions of dollars. “This year is the very, very worst. The community has to contact their legislators in Lansing and tell them that this situation is intolerable,” said Dr. Wanda Cook-Robinson Superintendent of Southfield Public Schools. (Oakland Press, December 20)

The Citizens Task Force wrote in its report that “Given the current economic condition of Michigan and the declining state revenues, Southfield Public Schools cannot afford to operate all of the schools it currently has.” Mayor Brock of Lathrup Village was quoted as saying “This is a time unparalleled, in my memory at least, of the history of the school district, and in many school districts.” (Oakland Press, December 20)

The Need for Fightback Program for Jobs and Quality Education

Even though there have been large protests against the cutbacks in school funding throughout the state, these demonstrations and speak outs have been organized on a district-by-district basis. What is needed is a broader program of struggle that can build coalitions across district lines and link the reductions in school funding to the overall economic crisis facing the United States.

In recent meetings of the Moratorium NOW! Coalition to Stop Foreclosures, Evictions and Utility Shutoffs, organizers have discussed strategies to address the economic crisis. An appeal went out last month urging people to pressure Gov. Jennifer Granholm to impose a blanket moratorium on utility shutoffs for the winter. DTE Energy routinely terminates services for over 150, 000 households every year.

Other upcoming actions will include the annual Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day rally and march in Detroit scheduled for January 18. One of the major themes of the MLK Day celebrations for 2010 will be the need for a real jobs program in Michigan and throughout the country.

Members of the Moratorium NOW! Coalition will also take another delegation to Lansing for the Governor’s “State of the State” address in late January. The Coalition is still pushing for a declaration of economic emergency in Michigan which has an official unemployment of 15 percent for 2009. However, in using the broader definition of joblessness, the actual figures have climbed above 20 percent.

The Coalition also wants to address the draconian cuts in school funding by working to build the March 4 national mobilization against the crisis in education. University students across the United States are gearing up for a day of protest which will demand the restoration of funding for both higher education and k-12 public schools.

Somalia News Update: Mortar Attack on MPs in Mogadishu; Ethiopians Enter South and Central Regions

Mortar attack on MPs in Somalia

At least eight people have died in a day of violence in Somalia which saw mortars fired at MPs meeting for the first time since August.

No MPs were killed in the attack but witnesses say three civilians died as government forces retaliated and shells hit a radio station.

A separate roadside bomb killed at least five people, officials say.

Hard-line Islamist groups are battling Somalia's UN-backed government, which controls only a few parts of Mogadishu.

The BBC's Mohamed Olad Hassan in Mogadishu says the mortar attack spread fear among MPs.

But he says the parliament is a concrete building protected by African Union tanks and hundreds of government troops - so the MPs were not in as much danger as people outside the compound.

Eyewitnesses said three shells hit a local radio station, killing the station director's wife and two other people.

At least 17 people were injured by the mortars.

Earlier in the day a roadside bomb targeted the car of a government minister, who had defected from the insurgency. The minister was not in the car at the time, but five other people were killed.

The day of violence comes weeks after a suicide bomber killed three ministers at a ceremony for newly graduated doctors.

Rebels from the al-Shabab group have denied carrying out that attack but have been behind other suicide attacks on government targets.

They are accused of links to al-Qaeda.

Somalia has not had a functioning national government since 1991.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/africa/8424945.stm
Published: 2009/12/21 15:55:36 GMT


Dec 21, 2009 - 1:12:09 PM
Somalia

Fighting erupts in southern Somali tow

Somalia’s hardline insurgent Al-Shabaab group claims that they have fought with an Ethiopian rebel group in Somali southern border town of Dhobley.

According to a senior Al-Shabaab official, the fighting broke out on Saturday between the group’s militia that control the town and fighters from Ogaden National Liberation Fronts (ONLF), which fights in eastern Ethiopia.

“We have attacked the ONLF militia to stop them from attacking and seizing Dhobley town,” said the official who requested anonymity.

The official said the fighting continued for an hour and they have inflicted heavy casualties on their rivals, adding that they have received the support of the locals to devastate the ONLF militia led by Sheikh Ahmed Madobe.

Sources told Garowe Online that at least 10 people, mostly combatants from both sides have been killed and over a dozen others injured in the fighting.

However, eyewitnesses in town, which strategically situated between Somalia and Kenya border, have confirmed the eruption of the fighting but could not comment about the casualty figures.

Al-Shabaab has previously fought with Hizbul Islam, another Somali militant over the town but has since claimed that Sheikh Ahmed Madobe, whom they consider part of the Ethiopian rebel group and not Hizbul Islam, instigated the fight.

GAROWE ONLINE


Dec 21, 2009 - 1:12:09 PM
Somalia

Ethiopian troops back in Somalia

Heavily armed Ethiopian troops with several army trucks have reportedly crossed the border into central Somali regions of Hiran and Galgadud, residents and reports said.

Residents of Balanbale town in central Galgadud region said they have seen Ethiopian military forces backed by army vehicles in the outskirts of the town.

One resident said the troops have dug trenches in positions without prior notice of the elders.

Ethiopian troops have also crossed the border and reached Kalabeyr town in Hiran region, about 22km (14 miles) from the Somali-Ethiopian border, according to locals.

A resident told Garowe Online “a lot of troops arrived in the area on early Saturday and have started making military manoeuvring.”

Ethiopian troops have in the past carried out military incursion into central Somalia to oust Islamist militant groups fighting the embattled UN-backed Somali government.

Since withdrawing from Somalia early this year, Addis Ababa amassed its troops along the border and kept watchful eye on political development in the war-torn country.

GAROWE ONLINE